Nonoperative versus operative management of type II odontoid fracture in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Avila, Mauricio J. [1 ]
Farber, S. Harrison [2 ]
Rabah, Nicholas M. [2 ]
Hopp, Morgan J. [2 ]
Chapple, Kristina M. [2 ]
Hurlbert, R. John [1 ]
Tumialan, Luis M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Neurosurg, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
cervical collar; elderly; geriatric; odontoid fracture; spine fusion; systematic review; treatment; ANTERIOR SCREW FIXATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; GERIATRIC POPULATION; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; EARLY COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; CERVICAL COLLAR; DENS FRACTURES; TERM OUTCOMES; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the cervical spine in adults older than 65 years of age. Fracture management remains controversial, given the inherently increased surgical risks in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare fusion rates and outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatments of type II odontoid fractures in the older population. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting the management of type II odontoid fractures in patients older than 65 years from database inception to September 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to compare rates of fusion, stable and unstable nonunion, mortality, and complication. RESULTS Forty-six articles were included in the final review. There were 2822 patients included in the different studies (48.9% female, 51.1% male), with a mean +/- SD age of 81.5 +/- 3.6 years. Patients in the operative group were significantly younger than patients in the nonoperative group (81.5 +/- 3.5 vs 83.4 +/- 2.5 years, p < 0.001). The overall (operative and nonoperative patients) fusion rate was 52.9% (720/1361). The fusion rate was higher in patients who underwent surgery (74.3%) than in those who underwent nonoperative management (40.3%) (OR 4.27, 95% CI 3.36-5.44). The likelihood of stable or unstable nonunion was lower in patients who underwent surgery (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.49 vs OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.47). Overall, 4.8% (46/964) of nonoperatively managed patients subsequently required surgery due to treatment failure. Patient mortality across all studies was 16.6% (452/2721), lower in the operative cohort (13.2%) than the nonoperative cohort (19.0%) (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.80). Complications were more likely in patients who underwent surgery (26.0% vs 18.5%) (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95). Length of stay was also higher with surgery (13.6 +/- 3.8 vs 8.1 +/- 1.9 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients older than 65 years of age with type II odontoid fractures had higher fusion rates when treated with surgery and higher stable nonunion rates when managed nonoperatively. Complications and length of stay were higher in the surgical cohort. Mortality rates were lower in patients managed with surgery, but this phenomenon could be related to surgical selection bias. Fewer than 5% of patients who underwent nonoperative treatment required revision surgery due to treatment failure, suggesting that stable nonunion is an acceptable treatment goal.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 53
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonoperative versus operative management of type II odontoid fracture in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Avila, Mauricio J.
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Rabah, Nicholas M.
    Hopp, Morgan J.
    Chapple, Kristina M.
    Hurlbert, R. John
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 40 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [2] Operative versus nonoperative management of acute odontoid Type II fractures: a meta-analysis Clinical article
    Nourbakhsh, Ali
    Shi, Runhua
    Vannemreddy, Prasad
    Nanda, Anil
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (06) : 651 - 658
  • [3] Deadly falls: operative versus nonoperative management of Type II odontoid process fracture in octogenarians
    Graffeo, Christopher S.
    Perry, Avital
    Puffer, Ross C.
    Carlstrom, Lucas P.
    Chang, Wendy
    Mallory, Grant W.
    Clarke, Michelle J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 26 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [4] The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: an updated meta-analysis
    Huybregts, Jeroen G. J.
    Barot, Karma A.
    Recio, Camila
    Doucette, Joanne
    Mekary, Rania A.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (10) : 3434 - 3449
  • [5] Conservative versus Surgical Treatment for Odontoid Fracture: Is the Surgical Treatment Harmful? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pommier, Benjamin
    Ollier, Edouard
    Pelletier, Jean-Baptiste
    Castel, Xavier
    Vassal, Francois
    Tetard, Marie-Charlotte
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 141 : 490 - +
  • [6] Surgical versus nonsurgical management for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review
    Sarode, Deep P.
    Demetriades, Andreas K.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (10) : 1921 - 1933
  • [7] Comparison of rerupture rates after operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon rupture in older populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Acevedo, Daniel
    Garcia, Jose R.
    Grewal, Rajvarun S.
    Vankara, Ashish
    Murdock, Christopher J.
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    Aiyer, Amiethab A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 52 : 112 - 118
  • [8] Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Nicholas
    Furey, Andrew
    Kurdin, Anton
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2018, 32 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [9] Operative Versus Nonoperative Management for Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cuzzolin, Marco
    Secco, Davide
    Guerra, Enrico
    Altamura, Sante Alessandro
    Filardo, Giuseppe
    Candrian, Christian
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [10] The AOSpine North America Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Mortality Study A Retrospective Review of Mortality Outcomes for Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of 322 Patients With Long-Term Follow-Up
    Chapman, Jens
    Smith, Justin S.
    Kopjar, Branko
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Arnold, Paul
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (13) : 1098 - 1104