Functioning Management and Recovery, a psychoeducational intervention for psychiatric residential facilities: a multicenter follow-up study

被引:0
作者
Veltro, Franco [1 ]
Latte, Gianmarco [1 ,2 ]
Pontarelli, Cristina [3 ,5 ]
Barcella, Mara [4 ]
Silveri, Laura [4 ]
Cardone, Gabriele [4 ]
Nicchiniello, Ilenia [3 ,5 ]
Pontarelli, Irene [1 ,3 ]
Zappone, Lilia [3 ,5 ]
Luso, Salvatore [6 ]
Leggero, Paolo [7 ]
机构
[1] Associazione Promozione Sociale AIDIPSaM APS, Associazione Italiana Diffusione Interventi Psico, Campobasso, Italy
[2] Dipartimento Salute Mentale ASL Napoli 1 Centro, Naples, Italy
[3] Centro Salute Mentale Campobasso, Dipartimento Salute Mentale Regione Molise, Campobasso, Italy
[4] Dipartimento Salute Mentale Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy
[5] Nuove Prospett Cooperativa, Busso, Italy
[6] Consorzio Utilita Sociale, Foggia, Italy
[7] Interact Cooperativa, Turin, Italy
关键词
Psychiatric residential facilities; Functioning; Recovery; Psychoeducational intervention; Salutogenesis; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY; BIPOLAR DISORDER; SOCIAL COGNITION; ILLNESS; IMPACT; SCHIZOPHRENIA; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RELIABILITY; INTEGRO;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-024-06033-2
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Aim Functional Management and Recovery is a standardized Psychoeducational Intervention, derived from "Integro", an effective salutogenic-psychoeducational intervention for people in recovery journey, designed to improve recovery and functioning of individuals with psychotic disorders in Psychiatric Residential Facilities (PRFs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes of this intervention elaborated specifically for PRFs where evidence based structured interventions seem rare and desirable. Methods 66 individuals with psychotic disorders were recruited in 9 PRFs dislocated in the North, Center and South Italy and 63 underwent a multicenter follow-up study with a two time-point evaluation (t0, pre-treatment and t1, 6 months; ). At each time point, social functioning was assessed as primary outcome by the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP); furthermore, psychopathological status was assessed by Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Recovery by Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), Cognitive Functioning by Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Stress management by Stress-Scale, Cognitive Flexibility by Modified Five-Point Test (M-FPT), Emotional Intelligence by Emotional Intelligence Index (EI-I), the PRF Atmosphere and the Opinion of users about the PFR by an ad hoc questionnaire. The Abilities Knowledge, the Utility and Pleasantness of sessions were measured by an ad hoc list of items. Results 63 individuals out of 66, 52 (82,5%) affected by schizophrenia and 11 (17,5%) by bipolar I disorder with psychotic symptoms according to DSM-5-TR completed the study. At the end of the study, 43 (68,3%) were male, 57 (90.5%) were single, 5 (7.9%) engaged, 1 (1.6%) married; 45 (71.4%) unemployed. The total scores of PSP, RAS, BPRS, BANS, Stress management, Abilities Knowledge, Utility and Pleasantness of sessions showed a statistically significant improvement at t1 vs. t0. Two sub-scales out of 5 of M-FPT showed a statistically significant improvement. The Emotional Intelligence, the Unit Atmosphere and the Opinion of Users about PFR improved without statistical significance. Six months after the end of the follow-up study 22 individuals of the sample were dismissed with a very high turnover. Conclusions After a six-month follow-up (a short period of time), these results showed improvement in functioning, the primary outcome, as well as in the following secondary outcome variables: RAS, BPRS, BANS, Stress management, Abilities Knowledge, two sub-scales out of 5 of M-FPT, Utility and Pleasantness of sessions. Overall, a remarkable impact of psychoeducational structured intervention on the key Recovery variables is observed. Further studies are needed to address extent and duration of these improvements.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Acharya T, 2017, PSYCHIAT DANUB, V29, pS619
  • [2] Problem-solving training modifies cognitive functioning and related functional connectivity in healthy adults
    Alescio-Lautier, Beatrice
    Chambon, Caroline
    Deshayes, Claire
    Anton, Jean-Luc
    Escoffier, Guy
    Ferrer, Marie-Helene
    Paban, Veronique
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 33 (01) : 103 - 138
  • [3] Antonovsky A., 1979, Health, stress and coping
  • [4] Prefrontal Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility and Stability
    Armbruster, Diana J. N.
    Ueltzhoeffer, Kai
    Basten, Ulrike
    Fiebach, Christian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 24 (12) : 2385 - 2399
  • [5] Forty years without mental hospitals in Italy
    Barbui, Corrado
    Papola, Davide
    Saraceno, Benedetto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2018, 12
  • [6] The Positivity Scale
    Caprara, Gian Vittorio
    Alessandri, Guido
    Eisenberg, Nancy
    Kupfer, A.
    Steca, Patrizia
    Giovanna Caprara, Maria
    Yamaguchi, Susumu
    Fukuzawa, Ai
    Abela, John
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 24 (03) : 701 - 712
  • [7] The Modified Five-Point Test: normative data for a sample of Italian healthy adults aged 16-60
    Cattelani, Raffaella
    Dal Sasso, Flora
    Corsini, Delfina
    Posteraro, Lucio
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 32 (04) : 595 - 601
  • [8] Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale
    Corrigan, PW
    Salzer, M
    Ralph, RO
    Sangster, Y
    Keck, L
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (04) : 1035 - 1041
  • [9] The recovery model in chronic mental health: A community-based investigation of social identity processes
    Cruwys, Tegan
    Stewart, Bridie
    Buckley, Lisa
    Gumley, James
    Scholz, Brett
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2020, 291
  • [10] The STROBE guidelines
    Cuschieri, Sarah
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 : 31 - 34