Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Baba, Akira [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kurokawa, Ryo [1 ,3 ]
Kurokawa, Mariko [1 ,3 ]
Rivera-de Choudens, Roberto [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Head and neck; squamous cell carcinoma; lymphoma; systematic review; meta-analysis; apparent diffusion coefficient; WEIGHTED MRI; ADC; LESIONS; BENIGN; CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; QUALITY; VALUES; TUMORS; ECHO;
D O I
10.1177/02841851241228487
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Radiological differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck is often difficult due to their similarities. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the two. Material and Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Forest plots and the pooled mean difference of ADC values were calculated to describe the relationship between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. Results The review identified eight studies with 440 patients (441 lesions) eligible for meta-analysis. Among all studies, the mean ADC values of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.88 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s and that of lymphoma was 0.64 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s. In the meta-analysis, the ADC value of lymphoma was significantly lower than that of squamous cell carcinoma (pooled mean difference = 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.168-0.302, P <0.0001). The Cochrane Q test (chi-square = 55.7, P <0.0001) and I-2 statistic (I2 = 87.4%, 95% CI = 77.4-93.0%) revealed significant heterogeneity. Conclusion This study highlights the value of quantitative assessment of ADC for objective and reliable differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the study data.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Surov, Alexey
    Meyer, Hans Jonas
    Wienke, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9
  • [2] Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Distant Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Daloiso, Antonio
    Franz, Leonardo
    Mondello, Tiziana
    Tisato, Matteo
    Negrisolo, Michael
    Zanatta, Paolo
    de Filippis, Cosimo
    Astolfi, Laura
    Marioni, Gino
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [3] Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for the differentiation between lymphoma and metastatic lymph nodes of squamous cell carcinoma In head and neck region
    Wang, Yan-Jun
    Xu, Xiao-Quan
    Hu, Hao
    Su, Guo-Yi
    Shen, Jie
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    Wu, Fei-Yun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (06) : 672 - 680
  • [4] Differentiating nasopharyngeal carcinoma from lymphoma in the head and neck region using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tabnak, Peyman
    HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 88 : E472 - E482
  • [5] Salvage surgery for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bulbul, Mustafa G.
    Genovese, Timothy J.
    Hagan, Kobina
    Rege, Soham
    Qureshi, Ahad
    Varvares, Mark A.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (01): : 275 - 285
  • [6] Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of FADD Upregulation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Angel Gonzalez-Moles, Miguel
    Ayen, Angela
    Gonzalez-Ruiz, Isabel
    De Porras-Carrique, Teresa
    Gonzalez-Ruiz, Lucia
    Ruiz-Avila, Isabel
    Ramos-Garcia, Pablo
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (09) : 1 - 23
  • [7] Extracapsular spread in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mermod, Maxime
    Tolstonog, Genrich
    Simon, Christian
    Monnier, Yan
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 62 : 60 - 71
  • [8] Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinoma and malignant salivary gland tumor of the head and neck
    Panyaping, Theeraphol
    Tepkidakarn, Nawanwat
    Kiatthanabumrung, Sivaporn
    Wattanatranon, Duangkamon
    Tritanon, Oranan
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 36 (05) : 548 - 554
  • [9] Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Winquist, Eric
    Oliver, Tom
    Gilbert, Ralph
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2007, 29 (01): : 38 - 46
  • [10] Utility of modified Glasgow prognostic score for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luan, Chih-Wei
    Kuo, Liang-Tseng
    Wang, Yun-Ting
    Liao, Chun-Ta
    Kang, Chung-Jan
    Lee, Yi-Chan
    Chen, Kuan-Yin
    Lai, Chia-Hsuan
    Tsai, Yuan-Hsiung
    Huang, Ethan I.
    Tsai, Ming-Shao
    Hsu, Cheng-Ming
    Chang, Geng-He
    Tsai, Yao-Te
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2023, 45 (07): : 1856 - 1867