Towards an understanding of the ethics of electronic consent in clinical trials

被引：0
|
作者：
Sahan, Katherine [2 ]
Wijesurendra, Rohan [1 ]
Preiss, David [1 ]
Mafham, Marion [1 ]
Sheehan, Mark [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Oxford, Clin Trial Serv Unit, Oxford Populat Hlth, Richard Doll Bldg,Old Rd Campus,Roosevelt Dr, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Big Data Inst, Ethox Ctr, Oxford Populat Hlth, Old Rd Campus,Roosevelt Dr, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
来源：
TRIALS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词：
INFORMED-CONSENT; DESIGN;
D O I：
10.1186/s13063-024-08330-3
中图分类号：
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号：
1001 ;
摘要：
There are good practical reasons to use electronic consent (e-consent) in randomised trials, especially when conducting large-scale clinical trials to answer population-level health research questions. However, determining ethical reasons for e-consent is not so clear and depends on a proper understanding of what e-consent means when used in clinical trials and its ethical significance. Here we focus on four features of ethical significance which give rise to a range of ethical considerations relating to e-consent and merit further focused ethics research.
引用
收藏
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pilot study demonstrating effectiveness of targeted education to improve informed consent understanding in AIDS clinical trials
    Sengupta, Sohini
    Lo, Bernard
    Strauss, Ronald P.
    Eron, Joseph
    Gifford, Allen L.
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2011, 23 (11): : 1382 - 1391
  • [22] Need for Ethics Approval and Patient Consent in Clinical Research
    Bath, Philip M. W.
    Watson, Alan R.
    STROKE, 2009, 40 (05) : 1555 - 1556
  • [23] Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Wendler, David
    Devireddy, Chandan M.
    Goldkind, Sara F.
    Ko, Yi-An
    Speight, Candace D.
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 15 (06) : 567 - 578
  • [24] Guideline for ethics review of clinical trials
    Minghuang Hong
    Zhao Yan
    Holistic Integrative Oncology, 4 (1):
  • [25] Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review
    Yusof, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd
    Teo, Chin Hai
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [26] Fragmented understanding: exploring the practice and meaning of informed consent in clinical trials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Nguyen, Yen Hong Thi
    Dang, Thuan Trong
    Lam, Ngoc Bao Hong
    Le, Phuong Thanh
    Nguyen, Phu Hoan
    Bull, Susan
    Kestelyn, Evelyne
    Van Nuil, Jennifer Ilo
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [27] Fragmented understanding: exploring the practice and meaning of informed consent in clinical trials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Yen Hong Thi Nguyen
    Thuan Trong Dang
    Ngoc Bao Hong Lam
    Phuong Thanh Le
    Phu Hoan Nguyen
    Susan Bull
    Evelyne Kestelyn
    Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil
    BMC Medical Ethics, 24
  • [28] Informed consent for clinical trials: In search of the "best" method
    Edwards, SJL
    Lilford, RJ
    Thornton, J
    Hewison, J
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 47 (11) : 1825 - 1840
  • [29] Consent in clinical trials: What do patients know?
    Hereu, Pilar
    Perez, Eulalia
    Fuentes, Inma
    Vidal, Xavier
    Sune, Pilar
    Maria Arnau, Josep
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 31 (05) : 443 - 446
  • [30] Ethical Acceptability of Postrandomization Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
    Miller, David Gibbes
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    Li, Xiaobai
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Flory, James
    Runge, Carlisle P.
    Relton, Clare
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (08)
12345