Unpacking the relevance of interpersonal trust in the blockchain era: Theory and experimental evidence

被引:2
作者
Milosav, Dorde [1 ]
Nistotskaya, Marina [2 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Blockchain technology; Interpersonal trust; Reciprocity; Experiments; SOCIAL TRUST; SMART CONTRACTS; ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS; UNITED-STATES; COOPERATION; RECIPROCITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100901
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Despite being proclaimed a "trust -free" technology, the link between blockchain and interpersonal trust remains understudied. By considering one of the most prominent use -cases of blockchain - smart contracts, we argue that the non -punitive nature of smart contracts may facilitate trustworthy behavior in human interaction by encouraging trustees to view themselves as internally motivated cooperators and to honor the trustor's move that exceeds the encoded response. We test this argument through an online experiment in which the hallmark property of smart contracts-automated enforcement-is exploited. The results show that trustees in the experimental treatment return ten percentage points more than their counterparts in the trust treatment, thereby exhibiting a more trustworthy behavior. This experimental evidence shows that the presence of blockchain technology does not crowd out all properties of trusting behavior from human interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] MTurk Research: Review and Recommendations
    Aguinis, Herman
    Villamor, Isabel
    Ramani, Ravi S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (04) : 823 - 837
  • [2] Trust Games and Beyond
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Farolfi, Federica
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin's Blockchain Technology
  • [4] Conducting interactive experiments online
    Arechar, Antonio A.
    Gaechter, Simon
    Molleman, Lucas
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (01) : 99 - 131
  • [5] Decomposing trust and trustworthiness
    Ashraf, Nava
    Bohnet, Iris
    Piankov, Nikita
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 9 (03) : 193 - 208
  • [6] Conceptualising time as a level of analysis: New directions in the analysis of trust dynamics
    Audrey Korsgaard, M.
    Kautz, Jason
    Bliese, Paul
    Samson, Katarzyna
    Kostyszyn, Patrycjusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRUST RESEARCH, 2018, 8 (02) : 142 - 165
  • [7] Auinger A., 2018, Blockchain and Trust: Refuting Some Widely-held Misconceptions
  • [8] Beck R., 2016, Proc. 24th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst, P1
  • [9] TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY
    BERG, J
    DICKHAUT, J
    MCCABE, K
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) : 122 - 142
  • [10] Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester, Michael
    Kwang, Tracy
    Gosling, Samuel D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 3 - 5