Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of trade-offs/synergies in land use functions in Hangzhou City, China

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu C. [1 ]
Yuan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2022年 / 38卷 / 06期
关键词
Function; Hangzhou City; Influencing factors; Land use; Spatio-temporal difference; Trade-off and synergy;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.030
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The contradictions between land production, living, and ecological functions have gradually emerged, as industrialization and urbanization continue to advance. It is necessary to accurately allocate and coordinate the functions of land development and protection for the reasonable distribution of human activities in sustainable agriculture. This study aims to explore the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs/synergies in the land use functions and the influencing factors. Taking Hangzhou City of China as an example, an attempt was made to evaluate the land production, living and ecological functions at the fine scale from 2000 to 2018 using the multi-source data and a series of geospatial models. Then, the correlation analysis was used to reveal the trade-offs/synergies of land use functions at the global and grid scales. The influencing factors of land use function trade-offs/synergies were also identified by the linear regression model. The results showed that: (1) The living function showed a trade-off relationship with the production and ecological function between 2000 and 2018, whereas the trade-off intensity of production and living functions was stronger than that of living and ecological functions. Production and ecological functions were established to determine a synergistic relationship during the study period. There was a trend of increasing first and then decreasing in the trade-off relationship between production and living functions, where the trade-offs of living and ecological functions gradually weakened. The interactive relationship between production and ecological functions was shifted from a synergistic relationship in 2000-2005 to a trade-off relationship in 2015-2018. (2) Spatially, the production-living function was dominated by strong trade-off and production-weakening trade-off, where the trade-off intensity tended to weaken from the east to the west and from the central to the periphery. The areas with a synergy state were located in the low-altitude mountain of central and western Hangzhou. The production-ecological function presented a mixed pattern of trade-off and synergy areas in space. The trade-off areas accounted for about 31%, with the weak trade-off and production-weakening trade-offs, mainly distributed in northern and eastern Hangzhou. The synergy areas occupied about 38%, with the weak synergy and simultaneous improving synergy, mainly distributed in the western and southern Hangzhou. The living-ecological function was dominated by the weak trade-off and ecology-weakening trade-off. The trade-off area accounts for 14%, where the trade-off intensity showed a trend of high in the east and low in the west, gradually decreasing from the center to the edge. The synergy relationship was dominated by weak synergy and simultaneous weakening synergy, the synergy areas accounted for 8%, mainly scattered in the outer suburbs. (3) Natural conditions and geographical location posed significant negative effects on the trade-offs/synergies in production-living and living-ecological functions, whereas there were significant positive effects on production-ecological function trade-offs/synergies. The urbanization-induced land conversion and the increase of land-use intensity further aggravated the trade-offs in land use functions. Therefore, there were different trade-offs/synergies in the land use functions at global and grid scales. The overall characteristics and local differences can be fully considered in the decision-making on land use function, according to the local conditions. © 2022, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Wiggering H, Dalchow C, Glemnitz M, Et al., Indicators for multifunctional land use: Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials, Ecological Indicators, 6, 1, pp. 238-249, (2006)
  • [2] Chen Ruishan, Cai Yunlong, Yan Xiang, Et al., The functions of land system and its sustainability assessment, China Land Science, 25, 1, pp. 8-15, (2011)
  • [3] Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M., Map the interactions between sustainable development goals, Nature, 534, 7607, pp. 320-322, (2016)
  • [4] Liu Y S, Fang F, Li Y H., Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making, Land Use Policy, 40, pp. 6-12, (2014)
  • [5] Wang Yafei, Guo Rui, Fan Jie, Evolution analysis of China's spatial development structure and pattern optimization of major function zones, Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35, 7, pp. 855-866, (2020)
  • [6] Verburg P H, Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Et al., From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3, pp. 1327-1335, (2009)
  • [7] Perez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, Et al., Land use functions: A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability, Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes, pp. 375-404, (2008)
  • [8] Liu Chao, Xu Yueqing, Liu Yanxu, Et al., Research on land use functions classification and evaluation system based on system theory, Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 54, 1, pp. 181-188, (2018)
  • [9] Paracchini M L, Pacini C, Jones M L, Et al., An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options, Ecological Indicators, 11, 1, pp. 71-80, (2011)
  • [10] Ji Zhengxin, Liu Chao, Xu Yueqing, Et al., Identification and optimal regulation of the production-living-ecological space based on quantitative land use functions, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 18, pp. 222-231, (2020)