Near-field seismic response assessment of buckling-restrained braced frames for different engineering demand parameters

被引:5
作者
Anand, T. P. [1 ]
Pandikkadavath, Muhamed Safeer [2 ]
Mangalathu, Sujith [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Civil Engn, Kozhikode 673601, India
[3] Puthoor PO, Kollam 691507, Kerala, India
关键词
Buckling restrained braces; Drift ratio; Brace ductility; Near -field seismicity; Nonlinear time response analysis; Fragility Curves; STEEL-CORE; LARGE-SCALE; PART II; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; DIRECTIVITY; BUILDINGS; STRENGTH; DESIGN; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108583
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper examines the seismic response of buckling restrained braced frames (BRBFs) under near-field (NF) ground motions to obtain the interrelationships among different engineering demand parameters (EDPs). Several case study BRBFs with varying span lengths and heights are designed based on relevant US design standards. These study frames are numerically developed in the OpenSees platform, incorporating the applicable nonlinear characteristics of the pertinent structural components. Nonlinear time response analyses are conducted on the adopted frames under a suite of NF ground motion records, and the results are post-processed to obtain structural responses in the form of EDPs such as inter-storey drift ratio (IDR), residual drift ratio (RDR), maximum ductility demand (mu max), and cumulative ductility demand (mu cum). Regression relationships among EDPs are also explored. Subsequently, probabilistic seismic demand models are developed, and the resulting fragility curves are generated. The results from the study can display the approximate regression relationships among the adopted EDPs under NF records. Identifying RDR as the critical EDP that governs the BRBF response under NF seismic excitation, distinct damage state (DS) values are also proposed for the IDR, mu max, and mu cum to facilitate fragility curve development. The study also shows that the increase in span length makes the BRBFs more vulnerable to permanent damage under NF disturbances.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Buckling restrained braced frame seismic response for far-field, near-field, and long-duration earthquakes [J].
Ahmad, Fokruddin ;
Phillips, Adam .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 199
[2]   Key parameters influencing performance and failure modes for BRBs using nonlinear FEA [J].
AlHamaydeh, Mohammad ;
Abed, Farid ;
Mustapha, Abdilwahhab .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 116 :1-18
[3]   Effect of bay-span length on ductility demand in steel-core buckling restrained braces under near-field seismic disturbances [J].
Anand, T. P. ;
Pandikkadavath, Muhamed Safeer .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 65 :1634-1641
[4]   Ductility capacity models for buckling-restrained braces [J].
Andrews, Blake M. ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. ;
Song, Junho .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2009, 65 (8-9) :1712-1720
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ANSI/AISC 341-16)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AISC 360 16
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, METHODOLOGY-EUR, V1 -
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
[9]  
Avci-Karatas C, 2019, KSCE J CIV ENG, V23, P4431
[10]   Experimental Investigation of Aluminum Alloy and Steel Core Buckling Restrained Braces (BRBs) [J].
Avci-Karatas, Cigdem ;
Celik, Oguz C. ;
Yalcin, Cem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2018, 18 (02) :650-673