Experimental study on performance of prestressed concrete beam-column substructure against progressive collapse

被引:0
作者
Deng X. [1 ]
Li Z. [1 ]
Weng Y. [1 ]
Yu X. [2 ]
Qian K. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning
[2] School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
来源
Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures | 2019年 / 40卷 / 08期
关键词
Beam-column substructure; Bonded prestressed tendon; Prestressed concrete; Progressive collapse; Pushdown test; Unbonded prestressed tendon;
D O I
10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.0117
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based the quasi-static pushdown test on four prestressed concrete (PC) beam-column substructures with bonded and unbonded tendons, the progressive collapse resistance of PC frames under an interior column removal scenario was investigated. Comparison of the pushdown results between bonded and unbonded PC beam-column substructures shows that the bond behavior could effectively improve the yield strength and initial stiffness. The collapse resistance of the two substructures is mainly attributed to the catenary mechanism developed by the prestress tendons and reinforcements. Moreover, the result of non-prestressed reinforcement ratio to its preformance against progressive collapse is also obvious. The increase of the non-prestressed reinforcement ratio causes unfavorable effect to the surrounding components at catenary action stage. Therefore, it is necessary to balance the ratio of prestressing tendons to non-prestressed reinforcements in the progressive collapse design of PC structures. © 2019, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Hu X., Qian J., Overview of analysis and design approaches for progressive collapse of structural, Building Structure, 36, pp. 573-577, (2006)
[2]  
Design of structures to resists progressive collapse UFC4-023-03, (2010)
[3]  
Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects Nov.2000, (2003)
[4]  
Qian K., Li B., Performance of three-dimensional reinforced concrete beam-column substructures under loss of a corner column scenario, Journal of Structural Engineering, 139, 4, pp. 584-594, (2013)
[5]  
Qian K., Luo D., He S., Yu X., Progressive collapse performance of reinforced concrete frame structures subjected to ground two-column removal scenario, Journal of Building Structures, 39, 1, pp. 61-68, (2018)
[6]  
Qian K., Li B., Dynamic performance of concrete beam-column substructures under the scenario of the loss of a corner column: experimental results, Engineering Structures, 42, 12, pp. 154-167, (2012)
[7]  
Wang H., Li Y., Lu X., Yan W., Guan Y., Experimental study on horizontal progressive collapse of one-story reinforced concrete frame, Journal of Building Structures, 37, 10, pp. 65-72, (2016)
[8]  
Wang H., Li Y., Lu X., Ye L., Yan W., An evaluation method for progressive collapse resistance based on a collapse probability and a resistance reservation indexes, Journal of Building Structures, 35, 10, pp. 65-72, (2014)
[9]  
Chu M., Zhou Y., Lu X., Li Y., An experimental study on one-way reinforced concrete beam-slab substructures for resisting progressive collapse, China Civil Engineering Journal, 49, 2, pp. 31-40, (2016)
[10]  
Zhou Y., Li Y., Lu X., Et al., An analytical model of compressive arch action of reinforced concrete frames to resist progressive collapse, Engineering Mechanics, 33, 4, pp. 34-42, (2016)