Comparison of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) for early prediction of septic shock in diabetic patients in Emergency Departments

被引:1
作者
Liengswangwong, Wijittra [1 ]
Siriwannabhorn, Ranchana [1 ]
Leela-Amornsin, Sittichok [2 ]
Yuksen, Chaiyaporn [1 ]
Sanguanwit, Pitsucha [1 ]
Duangsri, Chonthicha [1 ]
Kusonkhum, Nusara [1 ]
Saelim, Parnthap [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Ramathibodi Hosp, Chakri Naruebodindra Med Inst, 111 Moo 14, Bang Phli, Samut Prakan, Thailand
来源
BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Diabetes; Sepsis; Septic shock; Emergency department; Score; SEPSIS; DEFINITIONS; MORTALITY; SEVERITY; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-024-01078-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
IntroductionSepsis is a severe medical condition that can be life-threatening. If sepsis progresses to septic shock, the mortality rate increases to around 40%, much higher than the 10% mortality observed in sepsis. Diabetes increases infection and sepsis risk, making management complex. Various scores of screening tools, such as Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), are used to predict the severity or mortality rate of disease. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness and optimal cutoff points of these scores. We focused on the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes in the Emergency Department (ED). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to collect data on patients with diabetes. We collected prediction factors and MEWS, SOFA, SAPS II and APACHE II scores to predict septic shock in these patients. We determined the optimal cutoff points for each score. Subsequently, we compared the identified scores with the gold standard for diagnosing septic shock by applying the Sepsis-3 criteria. ResultsSystolic blood pressure (SBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pH, and lactate concentrations were significant predictors of septic shock (p < 0.001). The SOFA score performed well in predicting septic shock in patients with diabetes. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the SOFA score was 0.866 for detection within 48 h and 0.840 for detection after 2 h of admission to the ED, with the optimal cutoff score of >= 6. ConclusionSBP, SpO2, GCS, pH, and lactate concentrations are crucial for the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes. The SOFA score is a superior predictor for the onset of septic shock in patients with diabetes compared with MEWS, SAPS II, and APACHE II scores. Specifically, a cutoff of >= 6 in the SOFA score demonstrates high accuracy in predicting shock within 48 h post-ED visit and as early as 2 h after ED admission.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   13. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022 [J].
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee* .
DIABETES CARE, 2022, 45 :S195-S207
[2]   6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022 [J].
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee .
DIABETES CARE, 2022, 45 :S83-S96
[3]   High-performance detection and early prediction of septic shock for alcohol-use disorder patients [J].
Calvert, Jacob ;
Desautels, Thomas ;
Chettipally, Uli ;
Barton, Christopher ;
Hoffman, Jana ;
Jay, Melissa ;
Mao, Qingqing ;
Mohamadlou, Hamid ;
Das, Ritankar .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2016, 8 :50-55
[4]   Trends of increases in potential risk factors and prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus in Thailand [J].
Chavasit, V. ;
Kriengsinyos, W. ;
Photi, J. ;
Tontisirin, K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 71 (07) :839-843
[5]   Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Snyder, Ashley ;
Han, Xuan ;
Sokol, Sarah ;
Pettit, Natasha ;
Howell, Michael D. ;
Edelson, Dana P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195 (07) :906-911
[6]   Type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis: state of the art, certainties and missing evidence [J].
Costantini, Elisa ;
Carlin, Massimiliano ;
Porta, Massimo ;
Brizzi, Maria Felice .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2021, 58 (09) :1139-1151
[7]   Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches [J].
Esposito, Silvano ;
De Simone, Giuseppe ;
Boccia, Giovanni ;
De Caro, Francesco ;
Pagliano, Pasquale .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2017, 10 :204-212
[8]  
Evans L, 2021, INTENS CARE MED, V47, P1181, DOI [10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337]
[9]  
Godinjak Amina, 2016, Acta Med Acad, V45, P97, DOI 10.5644/ama2006-124.165
[10]   APACHE-II - A SEVERITY OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
DRAPER, EA ;
WAGNER, DP ;
ZIMMERMAN, JE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (10) :818-829