Efficacy and safety of atogepant, a small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, for the preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Hou, Min [1 ]
Luo, Xiaofeng [1 ]
He, Shuangshuang [1 ]
Yang, Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [1 ]
Jin, Meihua [1 ]
Zhang, Pan [1 ]
Li, Yang [1 ]
Bi, Xiaoting [1 ]
Li, Juan [1 ]
Cheng, Caiyi [1 ]
Xue, Qiang [2 ]
Xing, Haiyan [1 ]
Liu, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Dept Pharm, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med & Pharmaceut Coll, Dept Pharm, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
关键词
Migraine; Atogepant; CGRP receptor antagonists; Meta-analysis; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND;
D O I
10.1186/s10194-024-01822-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMigraine is one of the most common diseases worldwide while current treatment options are not ideal. New therapeutic classes of migraine, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, have been developed and shown considerable effectiveness and safety. The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of atogepant, a CGRP antagonist, for migraine prophylaxis from the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsThe Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ were searched for RCTs that compared atogepant with placebo for migraine prophylaxis from inception of the databases to Feb 1, 2024. Outcome data involving efficacy and safety were combined and analyzed using Review Manager Software version 5.3 (RevMan 5.3). For each outcome, risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated.Results4 RCTs with a total of 2813 subjects met our inclusion criteria. The overall effect estimate showed that atogepant was significantly superior to placebo in terms of the reduction of monthly migraine (SMD - 0.40, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.34) or headache (SMD - 0.39, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.33) days, the reduction of acute medication use days (SMD - 0.45, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.39) and 50% responder rate (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.89), while no dose-related improvements were found between different dosage groups. For the safety, significant number of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with atogepant than with placebo (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.21) while there was no obvious difference between the five dosage groups. Most TEAEs involved constipation (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.91-3.41), nausea (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.67-2.87) and urinary tract infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11). In addition, a high dosage of atogepant may also increase the risk of treatment-related TEAEs (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and fatigue (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.13-8.35).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that atogepant is effective and tolerable for migraine prophylaxis including episodic or chronic migraine compared with placebo. It is critical to weigh the benefits of different doses against the risk of adverse events in clinical application of atogepant. Longer and multi-dose trials with larger sample sizes are required to verify the current findings.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abbafati C, 2020, LANCET, V396, P1204
[2]   Role of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide on the Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Migraine-Clinical Considerations A Narrative Review [J].
Ailani, Jessica ;
Kaiser, Eric A. ;
Mathew, Paul G. ;
McAllister, Peter ;
Russo, Andrew F. ;
Velez, Christopher ;
Ramajo, Angela Pozo ;
Abdrabboh, Ahmad ;
Xu, Cen ;
Rasmussen, Soeren ;
Tepper, Stewart J. .
NEUROLOGY, 2022, 99 (19) :841-853
[3]   Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine [J].
Ailani, Jessica ;
Lipton, Richard B. ;
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Guo, Hua ;
Miceli, Rosa ;
Severt, Lawrence ;
Finnegan, Michelle ;
Trugman, Joel M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (08) :695-706
[4]   The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice [J].
Ailani, Jessica ;
Burch, Rebecca C. ;
Robbins, Matthew S. .
HEADACHE, 2021, 61 (07) :1021-1039
[5]   Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: Findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial [J].
Ashina, Messoud ;
Tepper, Stewart J. ;
Reuter, Uwe ;
Blumenfeld, Andrew M. ;
Hutchinson, Susan ;
Xia, Jing ;
Miceli, Rosa ;
Severt, Lawrence ;
Finnegan, Michelle ;
Trugman, Joel M. .
HEADACHE, 2023, 63 (01) :79-88
[6]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[7]   Patterns of Use and Reasons for Discontinuation of Prophylactic Medications for Episodic Migraine and Chronic Migraine: Results From the Second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II) [J].
Blumenfeld, Andrew M. ;
Bloudek, Lisa M. ;
Becker, Werner J. ;
Buse, Dawn C. ;
Varon, Sepideh F. ;
Maglinte, Gregory A. ;
Wilcox, Teresa K. ;
Kawata, Ariane K. ;
Lipton, Richard B. .
HEADACHE, 2013, 53 (04) :644-655
[8]   Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trial [J].
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Dodick, David W. ;
Ailani, Jessica ;
Trugman, Joel M. ;
Finnegan, Michelle ;
Lu, Kaifeng ;
Szegedi, Armin .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2020, 19 (09) :727-737
[9]   Understanding side-effects of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptor antibodies [J].
Haanes, Kristian Agmund ;
Edvinsson, Lars ;
Sams, Anette .
JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2020, 21 (01)
[10]   Systematic Review of Migraine Prophylaxis Adherence and Persistence [J].
Hepp, Zsolt ;
Bloudek, Lisa M. ;
Varon, Sepideh F. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2014, 20 (01) :22-33