A Comparative Evaluation of Push-Out Bond Strength of Six Different Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study

被引:0
作者
Dudulwar, Divya [1 ]
Patil, Suvarna [2 ]
Bandekar, Siddhesh [3 ]
Patil, Madhuri [4 ]
Gupta, Divya [1 ]
Gupta, Ruchika [1 ]
机构
[1] DY Patil Dent Sch, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Pune, India
[2] Vastandada Patil Dent Coll & Hospital, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Sangli, India
[3] Yogita Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Khed, India
[4] MA Rangoonwala Coll Dent Sci & Res Ctr, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Pune, India
关键词
smart seal; root canal sealer; propoints; procosol; gutta-percha; ENDODONTIC SEALERS; DENTIN; ADHESION;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.56481
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Adhesiveness with radicular dentin is absent with gutta-percha, leading to microleakage and hence re -infection. Root canal sealer helps to achieve an adhesive interface between gutta-percha and root dentin thereby resisting the displacement forces during the functioning of teeth which is evaluated by the push -out test. The aim of this study is to compare the push -out bond strength and to assess the relative bond failure between dentin -sealer, sealer -main cone of (1) epoxy resin, (2) silicon, (3) mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), (4) calcium hydroxide, (5) bioceramic, (6) zinc oxide eugenol containing root canal sealers. Methodology: Sixty human permanent lower premolars with one root were collected, disinfected, and decoronated at cemento-enamel junction. Instrumentation was done with a K3 40,0.06 Ni-Ti rotary file and obturated using the main cone and sealer. Based on the sealer utilized, six groups were created: Group 1: AH-Plus, Group 2: RoekoSeal, Group 3: MTA Fillapex, Group 4: Apexit, Group 5: Smart Paste Bio, and Group 6: Procosol. One slice each was obtained from the coronal, middle, and apical sections of all the obturated canals. Push -out bond strength and failure modes were studied. Statistics involved analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc Tukey test. Results: All three sections exhibited the highest strength for Smart Paste Bio sealer and the least was for RoekoSeal. With all the sealers, the apical section had the highest strength followed by the middle and coronal. Conclusion: The smart seal system was superior to all other sealers and displayed a good bond to dentin.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Abada H.M., 2015, TANTA DENT J, V12, P185, DOI [10.1016/j.tdj.2015.05.006, DOI 10.1016/J.TDJ.2015.05.006]
  • [2] Ali Naushad, 2019, J Conserv Dent, V22, P593, DOI 10.4103/JCD.JCD_553_18
  • [3] Arora Shashank, 2014, J Conserv Dent, V17, P364, DOI 10.4103/0972-0707.136512
  • [4] Biosmart Materials: Breaking New Ground in Dentistry
    Badami, Vijetha
    Ahuja, Bharat
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [5] Baldissera Renata, 2012, Braz. Dent. J., V23, P521
  • [6] The quantitative evaluation of apical sealing of four endodontic sealers
    Cobankara, FK
    Orucoglu, H
    Sengun, A
    Belli, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2006, 32 (01) : 66 - 68
  • [7] Dislocation Resistance of iRoot SP, a Calcium Silicate-based Sealer, from Radicular Dentine
    Ersahan, Seyda
    Aydin, Cumhur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (12) : 2000 - 2002
  • [8] Effect of Peracetic Acid as A Final Rinse on Push Out Bond Strength of Root Canal Sealers to Root Dentin
    Gaddala, Naresh
    Veeramachineni, Chandrasekhar
    Tummala, Muralidhar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (05) : ZC75 - ZC77
  • [9] Gurgel-Filho Eduardo Diogo, 2014, Braz. J. Oral Sci., V13, P114
  • [10] Hegde Vibha, 2015, Contemp Clin Dent, V6, P26, DOI 10.4103/0976-237X.149287