The Development of Pragmatic Markers in English as a Second Language: Do Age and Learning Context Matter?

被引:1
作者
Sanchez-Hernandez, Ariadna [1 ]
Baron, Julia [2 ]
Llanes, Angels [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept English Studie, Pl Menendez Pelayo S-N, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Modern Languages & Literatures & English Stud, C Gran Via Corts Catalanes 585, Barcelona 08007, Spain
[3] Univ Lleida, Dept Foreign Languages & Literatures, Pl Victor Siurana 1, Lleida 25003, Spain
关键词
stay abroad; at home; interlanguage pragmatics; L2; pragmatics; pragmatic markers; second language acquisition; DISCOURSE MARKERS; NONNATIVE SPEAKERS; ABROAD; LEARNERS; ACQUISITION; PROFICIENCY; LANGUAGE; STAY;
D O I
10.3390/languages9040115
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The present study explores the development of pragmatic marker (PM) use by children and adult L2 English learners in two learning contexts: study abroad (SA) and at home (AH). The study involved a group of 35 Catalan/Spanish girls (aged 11 to 13) learning English AH (n = 16) and abroad in Ireland (n = 19), and a group of 16 adult students aged 19-31 learning English in the UK and Ireland (n = 10) and at their home university in Barcelona (n = 6). To test their pragmatic development, the use of PMs was prompted through pre-test and post-test semi-structured interviews. The results indicated an effect of both age and context on PM development. Children in the SA context increased their use of some PMs, whereas their peers who remained at home did not show any development. Regarding the adults, both SA and AH participants increased their use of specific PMs. These findings shed some light on a topic that has not received scholarly attention in the field of L2 pragmatics: the development of PM use by children. Additionally, they contribute to the very small body of longitudinal studies on the development of PM use during SA.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Achiba M., 2003, Learning to request in a second language: A study of child interlanguage pragmatics
[2]   Learning Pragmatic Routines during Study Abroad: A Focus on Proficiency and Type of Routine [J].
Alcon Soler, Eva ;
Hernandez, Ariadna Sanchez .
ATLANTIS-JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH ASSOCIATION OF ANGLO-AMERICAN STUDIES, 2017, 39 (02) :191-210
[3]   Instruction and pragmatic change during study abroad email communication [J].
Alcon-Soler, Eva .
INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2015, 9 (01) :34-45
[4]   A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and English-medium instruction learners [J].
Ament, Jennifer ;
Baron Pares, Julia ;
Perez-Vidal, Carmen .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2020, 156 :41-53
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment
[6]   Pedagogical linguistics [J].
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen .
PEDAGOGICAL LINGUISTICS, 2020, 1 (01) :44-65
[7]   Developing L2 Pragmatics [J].
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2013, 63 :68-86
[8]   Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics [J].
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen ;
Bastos, Maria-Thereza .
INTERCULTURAL PRAGMATICS, 2011, 8 (03) :347-384
[9]   Pragmatic development and stay abroad [J].
Barron, Anne .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2019, 146 :43-53
[10]  
Beeching Kate., 2015, Researching Sociopragmatic Variation: Perspectives from Variational, Interlanguage and Contrastive Pragmatics, P147