Sick-leave duration after elective day case surgery in ENT: Is it affected by the type of employment?

Background: Many ENT day -case procedures are performed on otherwise healthy individuals in employment. We hypothesised patients ' type of employment may affect the amount of time taken off work following such procedures. We aimed to disprove the hypothesis that there is no difference in time taken off between employees and selfemployed individuals. Materials and methods: We prospectively collected data on working adult patients undertaking elective day -case procedures at our department. Collected information included basic patient demographics and type of employment. A telephone call was made to collect data on actual period of time taken off work, 5-6 weeks later. Results: 23% of patients were self-employed, the rest were employees. 92% of self-employed patients received no pay during their time off. This compared with 10% of employed patients receiving no pay. 77% of employed patients received full pay. Although mean time taken off work was less if the patient was self-employed (9.5 days vs 10.63), this was not found to be statistically significant. Discussion and conclusion: Our study demonstrates time off work following day -case ENT procedures places a higher financial burden on self-employed patients. This should inform patient counselling prior to operations. We demonstrated no statistically significant difference in time off work post -surgery between the 2 groups. There was a possible trend towards less time off in self-employed individuals and we speculate that further research with more patients may demonstrate a statistically significant difference in time off work. Perhaps most importantly is for doctors to consider how long an individual needs off after a given procedure, after taking account of their individual patient needs, rather than defaulting to a standard 2 -weeks. (c) 2023 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.