Application of support vector machine algorithm for early differential diagnosis of prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
Akinnuwesi B.A. [1 ]
Olayanju K.A. [2 ]
Aribisala B.S. [3 ]
Fashoto S.G. [1 ]
Mbunge E. [1 ]
Okpeku M. [4 ]
Owate P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Eswatini, Kwaluseni
[2] Department of Computer Science Education, Federal College of Education (Technology), Lagos State, Akoka
[3] Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Lagos State University, Lagos State, Ojo
[4] Department of Genetics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
来源
Data Science and Management | 2023年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
Computational intelligence; Confusable diseases; Early differential diagnosis; Logistic regression; Prostate cancer; Support vector machine;
D O I
10.1016/j.dsm.2022.10.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prostate cancer (PCa) symptoms are commonly confused with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), particularly in the early stages due to similarities between symptoms, and in some instances, underdiagnoses. Clinical methods have been utilized to diagnose PCa; however, at the full-blown stage, clinical methods usually present high risks of complicated side effects. Therefore, we proposed the use of support vector machine for early differential diagnosis of PCa (SVM-PCa-EDD). SVM was used to classify persons with and without PCa. We used the PCa dataset from the Kaggle Healthcare repository to develop and validate SVM model for classification. The PCa dataset consisted of 250 features and one class of features. Attributes considered in this study were age, body mass index (BMI), race, family history, obesity, trouble urinating, urine stream force, blood in semen, bone pain, and erectile dysfunction. The SVM-PCa-EDD was used for preprocessing the PCa dataset, specifically dealing with class imbalance, and for dimensionality reduction. After eliminating class imbalance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the logistic regression (LR) model trained with the downsampled dataset was 58.4%, whereas that of the AUC-ROC of LR trained with the class imbalance dataset was 54.3%. The SVM-PCa-EDD achieved 90% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. The validation of SVM-PCa-EDD using random forest and LR showed that SVM-PCa-EDD performed better in early differential diagnosis of PCa. The proposed model can assist medical experts in early diagnosis of PCa, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare settings and make further recommendations for PCa testing and treatment. © 2022 Xi'an Jiaotong University
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Adams J., The case of scirrhous of the prostate gland with corresponding affliction of the lymphatic glands in the lumbar region and in the pelvis, Lancet, 1, 1, (1853)
  • [2] Akinnuwesi B.A., Adegbite B.A., Adelowo F., Et al., Decision support system for diagnosing rheumatic-musculoskeletal disease using fuzzy cognitive map technique, Inform. Med. Unlocked, 18, 1, pp. 1-19, (2020)
  • [3] Aldoj N., Lukas S., Dewey M., Et al., Semi-automatic classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MR imaging using a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network, Eur. Radiol., 30, 2, pp. 1243-1253, (2020)
  • [4] Alexander D.D., Mink P.J., Cushing C.A., Et al., A review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of red and processed meat intake and prostate cancer, Nutr. J., 9, 1, pp. 9-50, (2010)
  • [5] Alkadi R., Taher F., El-Baz A., Et al., A deep learning-based approach for the detection and localization of prostate cancer in T2 magnetic resonance images, J. Digit. Imag., 32, 5, pp. 793-807, (2019)
  • [6] Alkhateeb A., Atikukke G., Rueda L., Machine learning methods for prostate cancer diagnosis. J, J. Cancer, 1, 3, pp. 70-75, (2020)
  • [7] American Cancer Society, Inc, (2022)
  • [8] Antonelli M., Johnston E.W., Dikaios N., Et al., Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists, Eur. Radiol., 29, 9, pp. 4754-4764, (2019)
  • [9] Barentsz J.O., Richenberg J., Clements R., Et al., ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012, Eur. Radiol., 22, 4, pp. 746-757, (2012)
  • [10] Bernatz S., Ackermann J., Mandel P., Et al., Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically significant prostate cancer of the peripheral zone with multiparametric MRI using clinical assessment categories and radiomic features, Eur. Radiol., 30, 12, pp. 6757-6769, (2020)