The Robot Rights and Responsibilities Scale: Development and Validation of a Metric for Understanding Perceptions of Robots' Rights and Responsibilities

被引:1
作者
Mays, Kate K. [1 ]
Cummings, James J. [2 ]
Katz, James E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Dept Community Dev & Appl Econ, 146 Univ Pl, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Coll Commun, Div Emerging Media Studies, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Robot rights; robot duties; artificial intelligence; human-machine communication; machine ethics; ontology; PERSONALITY; ANIMALS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2024.2338332
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The discussion and debates surrounding the robot rights topic demonstrate vast differences in the possible philosophical, ethical, and legal approaches to this question. Without top-down guidance of mutually agreed upon legal and moral imperatives, the public's attitudes should be an important component of the discussion. However, few studies have been conducted on how the general population views aspects of robot rights. The aim of the current study is to provide a new measurement that may facilitate such research. A Robot Rights and Responsibilities (RRR) scale is developed and tested. An exploratory factor analysis reveals a multi-dimensional construct with three factors-robots' rights, responsibilities, and capabilities-which are found to concur with theoretically relevant metrics. The RRR scale is contextualized in the ongoing discourse about the legal and moral standing of non-human and artificial entities. Implications for people's ontological perceptions of machines and suggestions for future empirical research are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:3413 / 3430
页数:18
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, UNIVERSAL DECLARATIO
[2]   Artificial Intelligence and Robot Responsibilities: Innovating Beyond Rights [J].
Ashrafian, Hutan .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2015, 21 (02) :317-326
[3]  
Asimov Isaac.I., 1950, Robot
[4]   Perceived Moral Patiency of Social Robots: Explication and Scale Development [J].
Banks, Jaime ;
Bowman, Nicholas David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2023, 15 (01) :101-113
[6]  
Beckers A., 2021, Three Liability Regimes for Artificial Intelligence
[7]  
Algorithmic Actants, Hybrids, Crowds, V1
[8]  
Bennett Belinda, 2020, Law, Innovation and Technology, V12, P60, DOI 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727063
[9]  
Bentham Jeremy., 1789, PRINCIPLES MORALS LE
[10]   Robot Rights? Let's Talk about Human Welfare Instead [J].
Birhane, Abeba ;
van Dijk, Jelle .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY AIES 2020, 2020, :207-213