Structural, Functional, and Genetic Changes Surrounding Electrodes Implanted in the Brain

被引:2
作者
Gupta, Bhavna [1 ,2 ]
Saxena, Akash [2 ,3 ]
Perillo, Mason L. [2 ,4 ]
Wade-Kleyn, Lauren C. [2 ,4 ]
Thompson, Cort H. [2 ,4 ]
Purcell, Erin K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Neurosci Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Inst Quantitat Hlth Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
TISSUE-RESPONSE; STIMULATION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; NANOPARTICLES; NEURONS; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00057
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Implantable neurotechnology enables monitoring and stimulating of the brain signals responsible for performing cognitive, motor, and sensory tasks. Electrode arrays implanted in the brain are increasingly used in the clinic to treat a variety of sources of neurological diseases and injuries. However, the implantation of a foreign body typically initiates a tissue response characterized by physical disruption of vasculature and the neuropil as well as the initiation of inflammation and the induction of reactive glial states. Likewise, electrical stimulation can induce damage to the surrounding tissue depending on the intensity and waveform parameters of the applied stimulus. These phenomena, in turn, are likely influenced by the surface chemistry and characteristics of the materials employed, but further information is needed to effectively link the biological responses observed to specific aspects of device design. In order to inform improved design of implantable neurotechnology, we are investigating the basic science principles governing device-tissue integration. We are employing multiple techniques to characterize the structural, functional, and genetic changes that occur in the cells surrounding implanted electrodes. First, we have developed a new "device-in-slice" technique to capture chronically implanted electrodes within thick slices of live rat brain tissue for interrogation with single-cell electrophysiology and two-photon imaging techniques. Our data revealed several new observations of tissue remodeling surrounding devices: (a) there was significant disruption of dendritic arbors in neurons near implants, where losses were driven asymmetrically on the implant-facing side. (b) There was a significant loss of dendritic spine densities in neurons near implants, with a shift toward more immature (nonfunctional) morphologies. (c) There was a reduction in excitatory neurotransmission surrounding implants, as evidenced by a reduction in the frequency of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Lastly, (d) there were changes in the electrophysiological underpinnings of neuronal spiking regularity. In parallel, we initiated new studies to explore changes in gene expression surrounding devices through spatial transcriptomics, which we applied to both recording and stimulating arrays. We found that (a) device implantation is associated with the induction of hundreds of genes associated with neuroinflammation, glial reactivity, oligodendrocyte function, and cellular metabolism and (b) electrical stimulation induces gene expression associated with damage or plasticity in a manner dependent upon the intensity of the applied stimulus. We are currently developing computational analysis tools to distill biomarkers of device-tissue interactions from large transcriptomics data sets. These results improve the current understanding of the biological response to electrodes implanted in the brain while producing new biomarkers for benchmarking the effects of novel electrode designs on responses. As the next generation of neurotechnology is developed, it will be increasingly important to understand the influence of novel materials, surface chemistries, and implant architectures on device performance as well as the relationship with the induction of specific cellular signaling pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1359
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[51]  
Prasad Abhishek, 2014, Front Neuroeng, V7, P2, DOI 10.3389/fneng.2014.00002
[52]   Flavopiridol reduces the impedance of neural prostheses in vivo without affecting recording quality [J].
Purcell, Erin K. ;
Thompson, David E. ;
Ludwig, Kip A. ;
Kipke, Daryl R. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2009, 183 (02) :149-157
[53]   Recent advances in fast-scan cyclic voltammetry [J].
Puthongkham, Pumidech ;
Venton, B. Jill .
ANALYST, 2020, 145 (04) :1087-1102
[54]   Nanodiamond Coating Improves the Sensitivity and Antifouling Properties of Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes [J].
Puthongkham, Pumidech ;
Venton, B. Jill .
ACS SENSORS, 2019, 4 (09) :2403-2411
[55]   Beta Oscillations in Freely Moving Parkinson's Subjects Are Attenuated During Deep Brain Stimulation [J].
Quinn, Emma J. ;
Blumenfeld, Zack ;
Velisar, Anca ;
Koop, Mandy Miller ;
Shreve, Lauren A. ;
Trager, Megan H. ;
Hill, Bruce C. ;
Kilbane, Camilla ;
Henderson, Jaimie M. ;
Bronte-Stewart, Helen .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2015, 30 (13) :1750-1758
[56]  
Ramon y Cayal S., 1995, HISTOLOGY NERVOUS SY
[57]   Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Depression, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Addiction [J].
Ranjan, Manish ;
Ranjan, Nutan ;
Deogaonkar, Milind ;
Rezai, Ali .
NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2020, 68 :282-287
[58]  
Riggins T. E., 2023, BIORXIV
[59]   Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Is Superior in Ameliorating Parkinsonism [J].
Rosin, Boris ;
Slovik, Maya ;
Mitelman, Rea ;
Rivlin-Etzion, Michal ;
Haber, Suzanne N. ;
Israel, Zvi ;
Vaadia, Eilon ;
Bergman, Hagai .
NEURON, 2011, 72 (02) :370-384
[60]   The use of deep brain stimulation in Tourette's syndrome [J].
Rotsides, Janine ;
Mammis, Antonios .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (05)