Day-ahead Market Quotation Strategy Considering Bilateral Transaction Between Energy Storage and New Energy

被引:0
|
作者
Li H. [1 ]
Wei J. [1 ]
Lü Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Yangpu District, Shanghai
来源
Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology | 2022年 / 46卷 / 12期
关键词
battery energy storage producer (BESP); bidding strategy; electricity market; game theory; new energy producer (NEP);
D O I
10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2022.1001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In view of the new energy producer (NEP) loss caused by the uncertainty of new energy, we take the battery energy storage as an entity of the electricity market to provide power support for the NEP. Firstly, based on the centralized electricity spot market, the paper allows the NEP to trade power with the battery energy storage producer (BESP) and then participate in the market bidding. Secondly, a linear model is used to describe the NEP bidding strategy related to the trading volume and the BESP bidding strategy affected by the charging state. By using the scenario method to describe the uncertainty of new energy contribution, a two-level game model of the NEP and the BESP in the day-ahead market is established. The upper level is a game model in which the NEP and the BESP participate in obtaining the maximization of market revenue, and the lower level is a day-ahead market clearing model in which the NEP and the traditional power producers compete for the lowest total price. Thirdly, the upper and the lower levels solve the bidding strategies of both the NEP and the BESP by using the interior point method and the self-adaptive global harmony searching through the interactive decision variables. Finally, an example shows that the participation of the BESP in the day-ahead market trading can not only increase the flexibility of the NEP bidding, but reduce the loss of the NEP due to the uncertainty of new energy. © 2022 Power System Technology Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4843 / 4851
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] MALLAPATY S, How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century[J], Nature, 586, 7830, pp. 482-483, (2020)
  • [2] Jinping XI, Building on past achievements and launching a new journey for global climate actions:statement at the climate ambition summit[J], Gazette of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 35, (2020)
  • [3] Zheng CHEN, YANG Jiajia, JING Xiaoming, A literature survey for pricing mechanisms and bidding strategies of renewable energy generation[J], Journal of North China Electric Power University, 41, 2, pp. 89-98, (2014)
  • [4] XIA Qing, YANG Zhifang, LAI Xiaowen, Electricity market design based on temporal pricing of renewable capacity [J], Power System Technology, 46, 5, pp. 1771-1779, (2022)
  • [5] ZHAO Shuqiang, Yang WU, LI Zhiwei, Analysis of power system peaking capacity and economy considering uncertainty of wind and solar output [J], Power System Technology, 46, 5, pp. 1752-1761, (2022)
  • [6] SUN Huijuan, GONG Lei, PENG Chunhua, Multi-objective dynamic decomposition optimal dispatch considering wind-photovoltaic-hydro multiple uncertainty confidence risk [J], Power System Technology, 46, 9, pp. 3416-3428, (2022)
  • [7] SUN Ke, ZHAO Pengfei, HAN Xiaonan, Electricity flow planning method for high penetration of renewable energy[J], Power System Technology, 44, 1, pp. 79-85, (2020)
  • [8] MORALES J M, CONEJO A J, PEREZ-RUIZ J., Short-term trading for a wind power producer[J], IEEE Transactions on power systems, 25, 1, pp. 554-564, (2010)
  • [9] BARINGO L, CONEJO A J., Offering strategy of wind-power producer:multi-stage risk-constrained approach[J], IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31, 2, pp. 1420-1429, (2016)
  • [10] WANG Tengfei, WANG Hui, Power insurance based support optimal decision of electricity market subjects[J], Automation of Electric Power Systems, 44, 12, pp. 56-63, (2020)