The Circularity of Materials from the Perspective of a Product Life Cycle: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Secondary Fence Boards-Part 1 (Baseline Scenario)

被引:1
作者
Kulczycka, Joanna [1 ]
Lewandowska, Anna [2 ]
Joachimiak-Lechman, Katarzyna [2 ]
Kurczewski, Przemyslaw [3 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Mineral & Energy Econ Res Inst, PL-31261 Krakow, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Inst Management, PL-61875 Poznan, Poland
[3] Poznan Univ Tech, Fac Civil & Transport Engn, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
waste management; recycling rate; recycled content; circularity; life cycle; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/resources13040050
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the era of the circular economy, solutions aimed at increasing the circularity of materials and products are highly welcome. Eco-design and waste management strategies are crucial for ensuring circularity and resource-saving. Strategies should be driven by assessing life cycle-based environmental performance. Tools to measure this performance should take into account two recycling-oriented parameters: recycled content and recycling rate. This paper presents the results of a life cycle assessment case study for a secondary fence board (baseline scenario). The circular footprint formula has been used to allocate burdens and credits between the supplier and the user of recycled materials. The potential environmental impact and the most significant issues have been calculated, identified, and presented. A general recommendation for further environmental development of the secondary fence board is to improve the production-related energy efficiency of recycling processes and increase the recycling rate of the board (to avoid landfilling).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
Fugiel A., 2017, Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol.-Organ. Manag. Ser. Organ. Manag, V100, P133, DOI [10.29119/1641-3466.2017.100.10, DOI 10.29119/1641-3466.2017.100.10]
[22]  
Guinde J.B., 2002, Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. Ila: Guide. lib: Operational annex. Ill: Scientific background, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RSER.2008.01.010
[23]  
International Standard Organization, 2006, 140442006 ISO
[24]  
Kaza S., 2018, WHAT WASTE 20 GLOBAL, DOI DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
[25]   Mixed municipal waste management in the Czech Republic from the point of view of the LCA method [J].
Koci, Vladimir ;
Trecakova, Tatiana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (02) :113-124
[26]  
Krexner T., 2021, P 48 INT S ACTUAL TA
[27]   Life Cycle Assessment and Optimization-Based Decision Analysis of Construction Waste Recycling for a LEED-Certified University Building [J].
Kucukvar, Murat ;
Egilmez, Gokhan ;
Tatari, Omer .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (01)
[28]  
Lewandowska A, 2004, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V9, P86, DOI 10.1007/BF02978567
[29]  
Replies of the European Commission to the European Court of Auditors, Special Report
[30]   Combining dynamic material flow analysis and life cycle assessment to evaluate environmental benefits of recycling - A case study for direct and hydrometallurgical closed-loop recycling of electric vehicle battery systems [J].
Rosenberg, Sonja ;
Kurz, Leonard ;
Huster, Sandra ;
Wehrstein, Steven ;
Kiemel, Steffen ;
Schultmann, Frank ;
Reichert, Frederik ;
Woerner, Ralf ;
Gloeser-Chahoud, Simon .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 198