The Circularity of Materials from the Perspective of a Product Life Cycle: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Secondary Fence Boards-Part 1 (Baseline Scenario)

被引:1
作者
Kulczycka, Joanna [1 ]
Lewandowska, Anna [2 ]
Joachimiak-Lechman, Katarzyna [2 ]
Kurczewski, Przemyslaw [3 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Mineral & Energy Econ Res Inst, PL-31261 Krakow, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Inst Management, PL-61875 Poznan, Poland
[3] Poznan Univ Tech, Fac Civil & Transport Engn, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
waste management; recycling rate; recycled content; circularity; life cycle; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/resources13040050
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the era of the circular economy, solutions aimed at increasing the circularity of materials and products are highly welcome. Eco-design and waste management strategies are crucial for ensuring circularity and resource-saving. Strategies should be driven by assessing life cycle-based environmental performance. Tools to measure this performance should take into account two recycling-oriented parameters: recycled content and recycling rate. This paper presents the results of a life cycle assessment case study for a secondary fence board (baseline scenario). The circular footprint formula has been used to allocate burdens and credits between the supplier and the user of recycled materials. The potential environmental impact and the most significant issues have been calculated, identified, and presented. A general recommendation for further environmental development of the secondary fence board is to improve the production-related energy efficiency of recycling processes and increase the recycling rate of the board (to avoid landfilling).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AIB (association of issuing bodies), About us
[2]   Leveraging Life Cycle Assessment to Better Promote the Circular Economy: A First Step Using the Concept of Opportunity Cost [J].
Aleisa, Esra ;
Heijungs, Reinout .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
[3]   The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative [J].
Allacker, Karen ;
Mathieux, Fabrice ;
Pennington, David ;
Pant, Rana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (09) :1441-1458
[4]  
[Anonymous], Plastic-the Facts The report
[5]  
[Anonymous], BRE Global Product Category Rules (PCR)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Implementation of the Leader Approach for Rural Development, P1
[7]  
[Anonymous], More Specific Rules for Defining the Electricity Market
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Recommendation 2021/2279/EU Commission Recommendation (EU) of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint Methods to Measure and Communicate the Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PAS 2050-Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services, P1
[10]  
[Anonymous], Generation of Waste by Economic Activity Eurostat Database