Contralateral approach using microscope and tubular retractor system for ipsilateral decompression of lumbar degenerative lateral recess stenosis associated with narrow spinal canal

被引:0
作者
Shu, Longfei [1 ]
Mu, Qingchun [2 ]
Dai, Feihu [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [1 ]
Syeda, Madiha Zahra [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Yuhai [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, 904 Hosp Joint Logist Support Force PLA, Dept Neurosurg, Wuxi Clin Coll, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Neurosurg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Keenan Res Ctr Biomed Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
contralateral approach; laminectomy alone; lateral recesses stenosis; minimally invasive; microscope; MINIMALLY INVASIVE DECOMPRESSION; BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; UNILATERAL APPROACH; LIGAMENTUM-FLAVUM; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOTOMY; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2024.1387801
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To summarize the clinical effect of a single-center retrospective analysis of the contralateral approach with a microscope and tubular retractor system for ipsilateral decompression in patients with lumbar lateral recess stenosis and a narrow spinal canal. Methods: A total of 25 patients who underwent ipsilateral decompression surgery via a contralateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system, performed by one surgeon at a single center were retrospectively examined. The width of the lamina fenestration was compared with the preoperative distance from the root of the spinous process to the dorsal articular facet, the bilateral articular facet change in the suprapedicle notch section on CT scan, and with the changes in transverse and sagittal diameters of the canal area on MRI. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Results: In total, 25 patients were treated and the mean intraoperative time was 82.04 +/- 12.48 min. There was no nerve injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and infection complications. The postoperative CT revealed that the width of the contralateral laminar fenestration was less than the distance from the root of the spinous process to the dorsal articular facet. The residual widths of the ipsilateral articular facet and contralateral articular facet were greater than 2/3 of the preoperative articular facet width. The transverse and sagittal diameter of canal were significantly increased. The mean follow-up period was 12-16 months, and no recurrence or reoperation incidence were found at the last follow-up. When compared to pre-surgery, the ODI, VAS, and JOA scores were significantly improved after surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on our single-center retrospective observation of 25 cases and combined with previous literature, the contralateral approach with a microscope and tubular retractor system for ipsilateral decompression in patients with lumbar lateral recess stenosis and a narrow spinal canal can reduce damage to the articular processes, and probably more conducive to the postoperative stability of the lumbar spine. This was a single center retrospective analysis with a small sample size and lacked randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, larger-scale, multicenter RTCs are required for additional validation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Lumbar stability following graded unilateral and bilateral facetectomy: A finite element model study [J].
Ahuja, S. ;
Moideen, A. N. ;
Dudhniwala, A. G. ;
Karatsis, E. ;
Papadakis, L. ;
Varitis, E. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 75
[2]   Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain [J].
Alimi, Marjan ;
Hofstetter, Christoph P. ;
Torres-Campa, Jose M. ;
Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo ;
Cong, Guang-Ting ;
Njoku, Innocent, Jr. ;
Hartl, Roger .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (02) :389-396
[3]   LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGIC FEATURES [J].
AMUNDSEN, T ;
WEBER, H ;
LILLEAS, F ;
NORDAL, HJ ;
ABDELNOOR, M ;
MAGNAES, B .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (10) :1178-1186
[4]   The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery [J].
Austevoll, Ivar M. ;
Gjestad, Rolf ;
Brox, Jens Ivar ;
Solberg, Tore K. ;
Storheim, Kjersti ;
Rekeland, Frode ;
Hermansen, Erland ;
Indrekvam, Kari ;
Hellum, Christian .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (02) :404-413
[5]   A Biomechanical Evaluation of Graded Posterior Element Removal for Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Approach With Two Standard Laminectomy Techniques [J].
Bresnahan, Lacey ;
Ogden, Alfred T. ;
Natarajan, Raghu N. ;
Fessler, Richard G. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) :17-23
[6]   LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF DECOMPRESSIVE SURGERY FOR DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR STENOSIS [J].
CAPUTY, AJ ;
LUESSENHOP, AJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 77 (05) :669-676
[7]   Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction [J].
den Boogert, Hugo F. ;
Keers, Joost C. ;
Oterdoom, D. L. Marinus ;
Kuijlen, Jos M. A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 23 (03) :326-335
[8]  
Foley KT., 1997, TECH NEUROSURG, V3, P301, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0303-8467(97)81738-6
[9]   Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Genevay, Stephane ;
Atlas, Steven J. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) :253-265
[10]   Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Approach for Decompression of Lateral Recess Stenosis [J].
Gulsever, Cafer Ikbal ;
Sahin, Duran ;
Ozturk, Sefa ;
Ahmadov, Tural ;
Sabanci, Pulat Akin .
JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2023, (192)