Decision Considerations for Securing and Managing Intellectual Property within Additive Manufacturing Supply Chains

被引:1
作者
Adu-Amankwa, Kwaku [1 ]
Rentizelas, Athanasios [2 ]
Daly, Angela [3 ]
Corney, Jonathan [4 ]
Wodehouse, Andrew [5 ]
Peron, Mirco [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Design Mfg & Engn Management, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Mech Engn, Athens, Greece
[3] Univ Dundee, Sch Sci & Engn, Leverhulme Res Ctr Forens Sci, Dundee, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Design Mfg & Engn Management, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Intellectual Property; Additive Manufacturing; Supply Chain Management; Decision; Consideration; MANAGEMENT; LEGAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.304
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Intellectual property is a crucial asset that generates debates about its effects on additive manufacturing supply chains. Actors within these supply chains must adapt to navigate intellectual property issues and decisions to sustain growth. However, no consensus exists among scholars and practitioners on '' whether, why, or how '' to secure and manage intellectual property, which complicates decision-making. This paper presents a quantitative survey of expert opinions from management, engineering, academia, and consultancy sectors on various decision considerations for securing and managing intellectual property in additive manufacturing supply chains. The findings indicate that decision-making remains significantly complex and non-uniform; this offers insights into crucial considerations when aiming to secure or manage intellectual property as a valued and balanced asset in additive manufacturing supply chains. Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
引用
收藏
页码:6543 / 6548
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Rethinking intellectual property rights and commons-based peer production in times of crisis: The case of COVID-19 and 3D printed medical devices [J].
Mahr, Dana ;
Dickel, Sascha .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2020, 15 (09) :711-717
[22]  
Noam E., 2019, Managing Media and Digital Organizations (1. Baski)
[23]  
Osborn LS, 2019, 3D PRINTING AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781316584507
[24]  
Paczkowski W.R., 2021, Business Analytics
[25]  
Rea L.M., 2014, Desiging and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide, V4th
[26]  
Rimmer M., 2019, Gonz. J. Int'l L., V23, P55
[27]  
Sallis JE., 2021, Research Methods and Data Analysis for Business Decisions: A Primer Using SPSS
[28]  
Saunders M., 2015, RES METHODS BUSINESS, V7, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SMR.2012.10.001
[29]  
Sepp P.-M., 2016, The Future of Law and eTechnologies, P81, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_5]
[30]  
Soares M, 2018, Revista Jurídica, V3, P199, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.7371080, 10.6084/m9.figshare.7371080, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7371080]