Structural Nonlinear Damage Identification Based on Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Conversion Index

被引:0
作者
Guo H. [1 ,2 ]
Wang Z. [1 ,2 ]
Li Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing
[2] School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing
来源
Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University | 2020年 / 55卷 / 03期
关键词
Acceleration response; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) model; Damage identification; Maximum likelihood estimation; Nonlinear;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180316
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To solve the identification problem of time-domain nonlinear damage, the incorporation of an autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) model with damage detection was proposed. First, the basic theory of ARCH model was described, and the order estimation and maximum likelihood parameter estimation of ARCH model were proposed. Then, the characteristics of nonlinear damage were analyzed, and a damage detection theory based on ARCH model was presented. Finally, it is difficult for the damage index based on degree of freedom to identify damage locations, an autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity conversion index (ARCHCI) was proposed. A three-storey frame experiment was used to verify the effectiveness of the ARCHCI, the effect of measurement error and model error was also considered in the experiment. The results show that the ARCHCI value of the damaged third storey is at least 21.7% higher than that of the cepstrum metric conversion index when the nonlinear gap distances are 0.05 mm and 0.10 mm; the ARCHCI value of the third storey is 3.7% higher than that of the cepstrum metric conversion index when the gap distance is 0.20 mm. © 2020, Editorial Department of Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 466and517
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
CARDEN E P., Vibration based condition monitoring:a review, Structural Health Monitoring, 3, 4, pp. 355-377, (2004)
[2]  
VAN A H., International research projects on structural damage detection, Key Engineering Materials, pp. 97-112, (2001)
[3]  
GUO Huiyong, LI Zhengliang, PENG Chuan, Resear-ches and advances in structural damage dynamic identification technology, Journal of Civil,Architec-tural and Environmental Engineering, 30, 1, pp. 140-145, (2008)
[4]  
YAN Weiming, MA Yuchao, HE Haoxiang, Et al., Cross-term extraction from bilinear time-frequency distributions and application in structural damage detection, Journal of Vibration,Measurement & Diagnosis, 34, 6, pp. 1014-1021, (2014)
[5]  
ZHANG Litao, LI Zhaoxia, FEI Qingguo, Study on structural damage identification using acceleration data in time domain, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 26, 9, pp. 138-141, (2007)
[6]  
KOPSAFTOPOULOS F P, FASSOIS S D., Vibration based health monitoring for a lightweight truss structure:experimental assessment of several statistical time series methods, Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing, 24, 7, pp. 1977-1997, (2010)
[7]  
DAS S, SAHA P, PATRO S K., Vibration-based damage detection techniques used for health monitoring of structures:a review, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 6, 3, pp. 477-507, (2016)
[8]  
FASSOIS S D, SAKELLARIOU J S., Time-series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 365, 1851, pp. 411-448, (2007)
[9]  
ZHENG H, MITA A., Localized damage detection of structures subject to multiple ambient excitations using two distance measures for autoregressive models, Structural Health Monitoring, 8, 3, pp. 207-222, (2009)
[10]  
ZHENG H, MITA A., Damage indicator defined as distance between ARMA models for structural health monitoring, Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 15, 7, pp. 992-1005, (2008)