Cantilever Failure of Modular Uncemented Femoral Revision Stem in Patients with Poor Proximal Femoral Support; How to avoid it?

被引:1
作者
Mohan, Rahul [1 ]
Unnikrishnan, Nithin [1 ]
Gudena, Ravindra [1 ]
机构
[1] Whiston Hosp, Mersey & West Lancashire Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Prescot, England
来源
ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
Bone support; Cantilever failure; Deficient proximal femur; Modular stem; Proximal femoral replacement; Revision hip; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; BONE LOSS; REPLACEMENT; FRACTURE; FEMUR; FIXATION;
D O I
10.22038/ABJS.2023.75373.3485
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Revision hip arthroplasty is a major surgical challenge and is even more difficult in cases with a deficient proximal femur. Modular uncemented cone body revision femoral stems were introduced as a solution. They have the advantage of optimising joint kinematics by allowing the variable degrees of version, offset and leg length. However, we noticed cantilever failure of such stems, particularly in patients with deficient proximal femoral support. Fatigue fracture of the revision femoral stems should raise questions about its use in patients with insufficient proximal femoral bone support. Methods: We present a case series of five patients with the cantilever failure of Stryker restoration modular stem conical distal femur prosthesis. These cases were identified during a retrospective review of revision hip surgeries performed at our trust. Results: The stem failed after an average of 22.6 months post-revision surgery. Primarily, poor proximal femur bone support with a well-fixed distal stem and secondarily high BMI led to this catastrophic failure in the absence of trauma. All five cases were re-revised to Stanmore proximal femoral replacement and achieved good functional outcomes after an average follow-up of seven years. Conclusion: Proximal femoral bone support should be restored to prevent early cantilever failure of distally fixed proximal modular revision femoral stems. Consider a proximal femoral replacement if we cannot ensure proximal bone support.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 244
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty - In the affirmative [J].
Barrack, RL .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (03) :98-100
[2]  
blob.core.windows, 2018, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual report
[3]  
Böhm P, 2001, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V83A, P1023
[4]   An Analysis of Reported Cases of Fracture of the Universal Exeter Femoral Stem Prosthesis [J].
Bolland, Ben J. R. F. ;
Wilson, Matthew J. ;
Howell, Jonathan R. ;
Hubble, Matthew J. W. ;
Timperley, A. John ;
Gie, Graham A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (04) :1318-1322
[5]   Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty [J].
Busch, CA ;
Charles, MN ;
Bourne, RB ;
Rorabeck, CH ;
MacDonald, SJ ;
McCalden, RW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (10) :1333-1336
[6]  
CHANDLER HP, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P130
[7]  
CHARNLEY J, 1975, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P105
[8]   FRACTURE AND LOOSENING OF CHARNLEY FEMORAL STEMS - COMPARISON BETWEEN 1ST-GENERATION AND SUBSEQUENT DESIGNS [J].
DALL, DM ;
LEARMONTH, ID ;
SOLOMON, MI ;
MILES, AW ;
DAVENPORT, JM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (02) :259-265
[9]  
EFTEKHAR N, 1971, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P93
[10]   Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting [J].
Eldridge, JDJ ;
Smith, EJ ;
Hubble, MJ ;
Whitehouse, SL ;
Learmonth, ID .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (05) :535-540