Does Digital Agricultural Technology Extension Service Enhance Sustainable Food Production? Evidence from Maize Farmers in China

被引:4
作者
Lun, Runqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [4 ]
Li, Guojing [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Qiyou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Agr Prod & Resource Econ, D-85354 Munich, Germany
[4] China Mobile Grp Design Inst Co Ltd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
digital agricultural technology extension service; sustainable food production; eco-efficiency of maize production; endogenous switching regression; potential mechanism; REGIONAL ECO-EFFICIENCY; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERSPECTIVE; ADOPTION; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; FOOTPRINT; SECURITY;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14020292
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This research aims to investigate the average and heterogeneous impacts of digital agricultural technology extension service use on eco-efficiency among 1302 maize-producing farmers from a major maize-producing area in Northeast China in 2022. The slack-based measure model with undesirable outputs is applied to calculate the eco-efficiency of maize production. To obtain an unbiased estimation of the average effect, the self-selection problem generated by observable and unobservable factors is solved by the endogenous switching regression model. Quantile regression is utilized to analyze the heterogeneous effect. Notably, the mediated effects model is utilized to examine the potential mechanism between them. Our findings indicate that digital agricultural technology extension service use can increase maize production's eco-efficiency. Digital agricultural technology extension service users would have reduced the eco-efficiency of the service by 0.148 (21.11%) if they had not used it. Digital agricultural technology extension service nonusers would have improved the eco-efficiency of the service by 0.214 (35.20%) if they had used it. The robustness check reconfirms the results. Moreover, digital agricultural technology extension service use is more helpful for maize farmers who have lower eco-efficiency than those who have higher eco-efficiency. Digital agricultural technology extension service use can improve the eco-efficiency of maize production through the application of organic fertilizers, green pesticides, and biodegradable agricultural films. There are policy implications of these findings: there is an argument for using the publicity of the digital agricultural technology extension service to encourage farmers to use sustainable inputs; additionally, it might be worthwhile to implement a categorized promotion strategy based on the different real-world situations.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Radio as an Agricultural Information Source in Rural Areas
    Adamides, George
    Stylianou, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & FOOD INFORMATION, 2018, 19 (04) : 362 - 376
  • [2] Aigner D., 1977, J Econom, V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
  • [3] A multiobjective DEA model to assess the eco-efficiency of agricultural practices within the CF plus DEA method
    Angulo-Meza, Lidia
    Gonzalez-Araya, Marcela
    Iriarte, Alfredo
    Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo
    Carlos Soares de Mello, Joao
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 161 : 151 - 161
  • [4] Measuring eco-efficiency in European regions: Evidence from a territorial perspective
    Bianchi, Marco
    del Valle, Ikerne
    Tapia, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276
  • [5] The impact of strengthening agricultural extension services on women farmers: Evidence from Ethiopia
    Buehren, Niklas
    Goldstein, Markus
    Molina, Ezequiel
    Vaillant, Julia
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 50 (04) : 407 - 419
  • [6] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [7] CNNIC, 2023, The 51st China Statistical Report on Internet Development
  • [8] Improving eco-efficiency for the sustainable agricultural production: A case study in Shandong, China
    Deng, Xiangzheng
    Gibson, John
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 : 394 - 400
  • [9] Land productivity and plot size: Is measurement error driving the inverse relationship?
    Desiere, Sam
    Jolliffe, Dean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 130 : 84 - 98
  • [10] Does Adaptation to Climate Change Provide Food Security? A Micro-Perspective from Ethiopia
    Di Falco, Salvatore
    Veronesi, Marcella
    Yesuf, Mahmud
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (03) : 825 - 842