共 44 条
Utilizing undisturbed soil sampling approach to predict elastic modulus of cohesive soils: a Gaussian process regression model
被引:10
|作者:
Nawaz, Muhammad Naqeeb
[1
]
Khan, Muhammad Hasnain Ayub
[2
]
Hassan, Waqas
[1
]
Jaffar, Syed Taseer Abbas
[3
]
Jafri, Turab H.
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
[2] Univ Lorraine, CNRS, LEMTA, ,LEMTA, F-54000 Nancy, France
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Key Lab Resilient Infrastruct Coastal Cities, MOE, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[4] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Busan 46241, South Korea
关键词:
Cone penetration test;
Elastic modulus;
Gaussian process regression;
Machine learning;
Sample disturbance;
Sensitivity analysis;
DISTURBANCE;
D O I:
10.1007/s41939-024-00458-8
中图分类号:
T [工业技术];
学科分类号:
08 ;
摘要:
This study addresses a critical issue of sample disturbance in predicting the elastic modulus (Es) of soft cohesive soils using machine learning techniques. Traditional approaches either use inaccurately disturbed soil samples or require complex in-situ testing, making accurate predictions of Es challenging. We aim to develop high-performing prediction models for Es of soft cohesive soils using undisturbed soil samples and gaussian process regression (GPR). To achieve this, a new laboratory dataset is established using undisturbed cohesive soil samples obtained through a Shelby tube sampler. GPR-based prediction models are then developed, with Es as the output parameter and six index properties as input features. These features include sand content (S), fine content (FC), liquid limit (LL), plastic limit (PL), water content (w), and soil density (d). The input parameters are organized into four groups (Group-1: S, FC, LL, PL, w, and d; Group-2: S, FC, LL, PL, w; Group-3: S, FC, LL, PL; Group-4: FC, LL, PL) for the development of four GPR-based models. Results indicate that a model incorporating all six input features demonstrates excellent performance, with R2 (correlation coefficient), RMSE (root mean square error), and MAE (mean absolute error) values of 0.999, 0.054, and 0.042, respectively. The effectiveness of the optimal model is further validated using field cone penetration test (CPT) data. Moreover, sensitivity and parametric investigations reveal that soil density, water content, and Atterberg limits significantly influence the characterization of Es in cohesive soils.
引用
收藏
页码:4255 / 4270
页数:16
相关论文