Update on the Selection Criteria of Plastic Surgery Residents

被引:0
|
作者
Asghari, Arya [1 ]
Hines, Eric [2 ]
Mocharnuk, Joseph [3 ]
Leis, Amber [2 ]
Wang, Eric D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif Northstate Univ, Coll Med, Elk Grove, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Plast Surg, 200 S Manchester Ave 650, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
plastic surgery; residency; selection criteria; match; program director; survey; NATIONAL-SURVEY; TRENDS; MATCH; APPLICANTS; PROTOCOLS;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003801
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPlastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is recognized as a highly competitive specialty. Since the first assessment of resident selection criteria in 2007, PRS residency programs have adopted holistic review processes and adapted to changes such as a decline in medical schools participating in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society as well as the recent transition to pass/fail grading for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 examination (Schultz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2892; Tadisina et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:330e-331e). This study was devised to evaluate current PRS residency criteria in light of these changes.MethodsAn anonymous, 12-item, electronic survey was generated and distributed using Alchemer. An email was sent to 171 program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) of PRS residency programs. Survey questions were developed to collect data regarding respondent demographics and their desired criteria when assessing residency applicants. Complete responses were collected and analyzed with summary statistics and multivariate logistic regression using RStudio (version 1.3.109).ResultsIn total, 44 (25.7% response rate) of the 171 PDs and APDs completed the survey. Of the 16 programs (36.4%) with a USMLE cutoff score, 7 (43.8%) reported a range of 230 to 239 and 6 (37.5%) reported a range of 240 to 249. Without a score for step 1, the majority (48.8%) of respondents believe that step 2 scores will replace step 1 scores in terms of assessment criteria, and the content of recommendation letters was selected as the criterion with the greatest increase in weight (66.7%). In addition, 27.3% of programs require a step 2 score at the time of interview. The top 3 academic criteria in order of decreasing importance were the content of recommendation letters, clinical grades, and letter writers, whereas the top 3 nonacademic criteria were subinternship performance, maturity, and interview performance.ConclusionsPlastic and reconstructive surgery remains a highly competitive specialty for residency applicants. Our findings suggest that Alpha Omega Alpha membership remains diminished in importance, whereas USMLE cutoff scores have increased. With recent changes in the step 1 grading system, PDs and APDs will rely more heavily on step 2 scores and the content of recommendation letters.
引用
收藏
页码:S327 / S330
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship Survey: Fellows Selection Criteria for Training Programs
    Shantha, Jessica G.
    Shulman, Benjamin
    Gonzalez, Mithra
    Hink, Eric M.
    Durairaj, Vikram D.
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 29 (06): : 428 - 430
  • [42] Discussion: The Implications of Virtual Learning on Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey of Plastic Surgery Residents and Fellows
    Alvarez, Angelica Hernandez
    Foppiani, Jose
    Lin, Samuel J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (08)
  • [43] Residents' Views of Plastic Surgery in the Geriatric Population An Objective Needs Assessment for Graduate Plastic Surgery Education
    Levi, Benjamin
    Clevenger, Lauren
    Williams, Brent C.
    Kasten, Steven J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 63 (03) : 314 - 317
  • [44] Selection criteria and tools for malolactic starters development: an update
    Torriani, Sandra
    Felis, Giovanna E.
    Fracchetti, Fabio
    ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 61 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [45] Update on criteria for cadaveric donor selection for liver transplantation
    Yandza, T
    Aubert, F
    Fourcade, L
    Jan, D
    Lacaille, F
    Hubert, P
    Revillon, Y
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2003, 27 (02): : 163 - 175
  • [46] Emergency Medicine Residency Selection Criteria: An Update and Comparison
    Negaard, Matthew
    Assimacopoulos, Evangelia
    Harland, Karisa
    Van Heukelom, Jon
    AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2018, 2 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [47] Selection criteria and tools for malolactic starters development: an update
    Sandra Torriani
    Giovanna E. Felis
    Fabio Fracchetti
    Annals of Microbiology, 2011, 61 : 33 - 39
  • [48] Resident Selection Protocols in Plastic Surgery: A National Survey of Plastic Surgery Program Directors
    Janis, Jeffrey E.
    Hatef, Daniel A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) : 1929 - 1939
  • [49] DO THE CRITERIA OF RESIDENT SELECTION COMMITTEES PREDICT RESIDENTS PERFORMANCES
    FINE, PL
    HAYWARD, RA
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1995, 70 (09) : 834 - 838
  • [50] Key criteria for selection of radiology residents: Results of a national survey
    Otero, Hansel J.
    Erturk, Sukru M.
    Ondategui-Parra, Silvia
    Ros, Pablo R.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (09) : 1155 - 1164