Update on the Selection Criteria of Plastic Surgery Residents

被引:0
|
作者
Asghari, Arya [1 ]
Hines, Eric [2 ]
Mocharnuk, Joseph [3 ]
Leis, Amber [2 ]
Wang, Eric D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif Northstate Univ, Coll Med, Elk Grove, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Plast Surg, 200 S Manchester Ave 650, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
plastic surgery; residency; selection criteria; match; program director; survey; NATIONAL-SURVEY; TRENDS; MATCH; APPLICANTS; PROTOCOLS;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003801
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPlastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is recognized as a highly competitive specialty. Since the first assessment of resident selection criteria in 2007, PRS residency programs have adopted holistic review processes and adapted to changes such as a decline in medical schools participating in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society as well as the recent transition to pass/fail grading for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 examination (Schultz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2892; Tadisina et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:330e-331e). This study was devised to evaluate current PRS residency criteria in light of these changes.MethodsAn anonymous, 12-item, electronic survey was generated and distributed using Alchemer. An email was sent to 171 program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) of PRS residency programs. Survey questions were developed to collect data regarding respondent demographics and their desired criteria when assessing residency applicants. Complete responses were collected and analyzed with summary statistics and multivariate logistic regression using RStudio (version 1.3.109).ResultsIn total, 44 (25.7% response rate) of the 171 PDs and APDs completed the survey. Of the 16 programs (36.4%) with a USMLE cutoff score, 7 (43.8%) reported a range of 230 to 239 and 6 (37.5%) reported a range of 240 to 249. Without a score for step 1, the majority (48.8%) of respondents believe that step 2 scores will replace step 1 scores in terms of assessment criteria, and the content of recommendation letters was selected as the criterion with the greatest increase in weight (66.7%). In addition, 27.3% of programs require a step 2 score at the time of interview. The top 3 academic criteria in order of decreasing importance were the content of recommendation letters, clinical grades, and letter writers, whereas the top 3 nonacademic criteria were subinternship performance, maturity, and interview performance.ConclusionsPlastic and reconstructive surgery remains a highly competitive specialty for residency applicants. Our findings suggest that Alpha Omega Alpha membership remains diminished in importance, whereas USMLE cutoff scores have increased. With recent changes in the step 1 grading system, PDs and APDs will rely more heavily on step 2 scores and the content of recommendation letters.
引用
收藏
页码:S327 / S330
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Update in Wound Healing in Facial Plastic Surgery
    Hershcovitch, Meir D.
    Hom, David B.
    ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 14 (06) : 387 - 393
  • [22] The Declining Presence of Plastic Surgery in Hand Surgery: An Update in 2020
    Reghunathan, Meera
    Kordahi, Anthony M.
    Blum, Jessica
    Leis, Amber
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (06) : 1090E - 1091E
  • [23] Variability in Hand Surgery Training Among Plastic and Orthopaedic Surgery Residents
    Testa, Edward J.
    Orman, Sebastian
    Bergen, Michael A.
    Ready, Lauren V.
    Li, Neill Y.
    Gil, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2022, 6 (01):
  • [24] Unsuitable Patient Selection in Plastic Surgery
    Ilango, Nambi
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (03) : 831 - 831
  • [25] Opinions on Authorship: A Survey of Plastic Surgery Residents and Fellows
    Momeni, Arash
    Hunter, Cedric
    Li, Alexander Y.
    Safa, Bauback
    Wan, Derrick C.
    Kneser, Ulrich
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (06) : 660 - 663
  • [26] PATHOLOGY TRAINING FOR RESIDENTS IN PLASTIC-SURGERY - REPLY
    ACKERMAN, AB
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 87 (02) : 387 - 387
  • [27] A survey of current state of training of plastic surgery residents
    Hashmi A.
    Khan F.A.
    Herman F.
    Narasimhan N.
    Khan S.
    Kubiak C.
    Gursel E.
    Edelman D.A.
    BMC Research Notes, 10 (1)
  • [28] Training Current and Future Residents in Facial Plastic Surgery
    Hom, David B.
    JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 19 (06) : 468 - 469
  • [29] The expert witness in plastic surgery: Criteria and obligations
    Rohrich, RJ
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (06) : 2051 - 2052
  • [30] Emotional Intelligence and Burnout in Plastic Surgery Residents: Is There a Relationship?
    Bin Dahmash, Abdulmajeed
    Alhadlaq, Abdulmajeed S.
    Alhujayri, Abdulaziz K.
    Alkholaiwi, Feras
    Alosaimi, Nawaf A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (05) : E2057