Analyzing the degree persistence of shocks to energy security of the G7 countries: Evidence using panel SPSM-quantile unit root test

被引:9
作者
Fan, Yi [1 ]
Chang, Tsangyao [2 ,3 ]
Ranjbar, Omid [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Coll Econ, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] CTBC Business Sch, Dept Business Adm, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Allameh Tabataba I Univ, Tehran, Iran
[5] Trade Promot Org Iran, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Energy security; Energy security risk index; Panel quantile unit root; Quantile regression; Sequential panel selection method; G7; countries; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; STATIONARITY; ELECTRICITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2024.03.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Energy security is affected by extreme natural, human, domestic political, geopolitical, and fossil energy price shocks/events and green energy policies. The degree of persistence in energy security determines the magnitudes of social, economic, and environmental outcomes of the shocks/policies. In this paper, we examined the degree of persistence in energy security of G7 countries using a new proxy namely the energy security risk index, and a novel second-generation panel quantile unit root test over the period 1980 - 2018. In addition, we applied the sequential panel selection method (SPSM), to identify the stationary members within each quantile. Our results indicated the stochastic properties of the energy security risk indexes vary across the quantile and the countries. Among the G7 countries, the energy security risk index of the US displays unit root process within all quantiles. While the energy security risk indexes of other countries display stationary processes, especially within high quantiles. Our results have important policy implications regarding the effectiveness of green policies in improving the energy security of the G7 countries and the disturbance effects of anti-energy security shocks. According to our findings, the US has to constantly pursue the risks that threaten the country ' s energy system while other G7 countries likely do not have such severe concerns about shocks affecting energy security, and these shocks have a short-term effect on their energy security.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 399
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Energy security in Israel and Jordan: The role of renewable energy sources [J].
Abu Hamed, Tareq ;
Bressler, Lindsey .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 135 :378-389
[2]  
Adedeji A.A., 2024, Next Energy, V2, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NXENER.2023.100055
[3]   Green energy security assessment in Morocco: green finance as a step toward sustainable energy transition [J].
Ainou, Fatima Zahra ;
Ali, Mohsin ;
Sadiq, Muhammad .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (22) :61411-61429
[4]   Energy security and renewable energy policy analysis of Pakistan [J].
Aized, Tauseef ;
Shahid, Muhammad ;
Bhatti, Amanat Ali ;
Saleem, Muhammad ;
Anandarajah, Gabrial .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 84 :155-169
[5]   THE ROLE OF ENERGY SECURITY IN ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ASIA: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND POLICY OPTIONS [J].
Alekhina, Victoriia .
SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 66 (02) :545-567
[6]   Examining the patterns of disaggregate energy security risk and crude oil price: the USA scenario over 1970-2040 [J].
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Ozkan, Oktay ;
Obekpa, Hephzibah Onyeje .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 82
[7]  
Anancharoenkij T., 2021, Poverty Reduction for Inclusive Sustainable Growth in Developing Asia Internet, P185, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-1107-09
[8]   Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Choong, W. L. ;
Ng, T. S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1077-1093
[9]   Does classification of green aid flows matter for environmental quality? [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Pinar, Mehmet ;
Unlu, Emre .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 66 (01) :53-73
[10]   REAL INTEREST RATE PARITY AND FOURIER QUANTILE UNIT ROOT TEST [J].
Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen ;
Chang, Tsangyao ;
Elmi, Zahra ;
Ranjbar, Omid .
BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2019, 71 (03) :348-358