Unleashing the power of machine learning and remote sensing for robust seasonal drought monitoring: A stacking ensemble approach

被引:7
|
作者
Xu, Xinlei [1 ]
Chen, Fangzheng [1 ]
Wang, Bin [2 ]
Harrison, Matthew Tom [3 ]
Chen, Yong [1 ,4 ]
Liu, Ke [3 ]
Zhang, Chenxia [1 ]
Zhang, Meiqin [1 ]
Zhang, Xueliang [1 ]
Feng, Puyu [1 ,4 ]
Hu, Kelin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Minist Agr, Coll Land Sci & Technol, Key Lab Arable Land Conservat North China, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Wagga Wagga Agr Inst, New South Wales Dept Primary Ind, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Launceston, Tas 7248, Australia
[4] China Agr Univ, Lab Efficient Utilizat Agr Water Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Seasonal drought; Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration; Index; Machine learning; Ensemble learning; Remote sensing; AGRICULTURAL DROUGHT; INDEX; PREDICTION; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131102
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Droughts cause significant economic losses in many regions around the world, highlighting a need to more accurately quantify implications of drought on production and water management. Remote sensing technologies and machine learning-based models offer promising solutions for timely and accurate regional drought monitoring, but the accuracy of such approaches is constrained by both the conceptual design and algorithms underpinning such approaches. We developed a machine learning stacking ensemble approach to overcome such limitations, drawing upon Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Network-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) remote sensing products, and climate zoning data to estimate 3-month scale SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, SPEI-3) in 9 sub-regions of China. We compared 19 individual machine learning models and used the stacking approach to select the most robust meta-model for SPEI-3 prediction. We found that CatBoost Regressor (CBR), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Random Forest (RF) were the top individual models for predicting drought, while using CBR as the stacked meta-model achieved the best performance. The R2 values for the stacking model with CBR as the meta-model were 0.9065 and 0.8218 in the eastern and western regions, respectively. We then employed the stacking model with CBR as the meta-model to generate seasonal drought maps based on SPEI-3 across different years and seasons. Our predicted SPEI-3 was compared with drought maps generated by the GPCC and ERA5 reanalysis datasets. We found a strong correlation between them with R2 exceeding 0.8 across multiple years and seasons, indicating our machine learning stacking ensemble approach had a good performance in monitoring seasonal drought conditions. The findings of our study establish a standardized protocol for predicting droughts in the agricultural sector, enabling its widespread application irrespective of variations in terrain and climate.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unleashing the power of machine learning in cancer analysis: a novel gene selection and classifier ensemble strategy
    Tripathy J.
    Dash R.
    Pattanayak B.K.
    Research on Biomedical Engineering, 2024, 40 (01) : 125 - 137
  • [32] Machine learning and remote sensing based time series analysis for drought risk prediction in Borena Zone, Southwest Ethiopia
    Bojer, Amanuel Kumsa
    Biru, Bereket Hailu
    Al-Quraishi, Ayad M. Fadhil
    Debelee, Taye Girma
    Negera, Worku Gachena
    Woldesillasie, Firesew Feyiso
    Esubalew, Sintayehu Zekarias
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 222
  • [33] A machine learning approach for efficient and robust resistance spot welding monitoring
    Bogaerts, Lars
    Dejans, Arnout
    Faes, Matthias G. R.
    Moens, David
    WELDING IN THE WORLD, 2023, 67 (08) : 1923 - 1935
  • [34] Air Temperature Monitoring over Low Latitude Rice Planting Areas: Combining Remote Sensing, Model Assimilation, and Machine Learning Techniques
    Lin, Minghao
    Fang, Qiang
    Xia, Jizhe
    Xu, Chenyang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [35] Decadal Dynamics of Rangeland Cover Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Approach
    Yang, Yujing
    Li, Zhiming
    Quddoos, Abdul
    Aslam, Rana Waqar
    Naz, Iram
    Khalid, Muhammad Burhan
    Afzal, Zohaib
    Liaquat, Muhammad Azeem
    Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2025, 100 : 1 - 13
  • [36] An Ensemble Learning Approach for Urban Land Use Mapping Based on Remote Sensing Imagery and Social Sensing Data
    Huang, Zhou
    Qi, Houji
    Kang, Chaogui
    Su, Yuelong
    Liu, Yu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (19) : 1 - 18
  • [37] Predicting subnational GDP in Vietnam with remote sensing data: a machine learning approach
    Suleiman, Hussein
    Nguyen, Minh-Thu Thi
    Mendez, Carlos
    LETTERS IN SPATIAL AND RESOURCE SCIENCES, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [38] Monitoring channel ice conditions in cold regions using remote sensing and machine learning
    Guan G.
    Xiong F.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 40 (04): : 194 - 203
  • [39] Monitoring soil nutrients using machine learning based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing
    Liu, Kai
    Wang, Yufeng
    Peng, Zhiqing
    Xu, Xinxin
    Liu, Jingjing
    Song, Yuehui
    Di, Huige
    Hua, Dengxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 45 (14) : 4897 - 4921
  • [40] An Integrated Monitoring System for Coastal and Riparian Areas Based on Remote Sensing and Machine Learning
    Tzepkenlis, Anastasios
    Grammalidis, Nikos
    Kontopoulos, Christos
    Charalampopoulou, Vasiliki
    Kitsiou, Dimitra
    Pataki, Zoi
    Patera, Anastasia
    Nitis, Theodoros
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (09)