Health professionals' practices and perspectives of post-stroke coordinated discharge planning: a national survey

被引:1
作者
Ingram, Lara [1 ]
Pitt, Rachelle [1 ,2 ]
Shrubsole, Kirstine [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Queensland Hlth, Off Chief Allied Hlth Officer, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Queensland Aphasia Res Ctr, Herston, Australia
[4] Metro South Hlth, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Speech Pathol Dept, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] La Trobe Univ, Ctr Res Excellence Aphasia Recovery & Rehabil, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
barriers; coordinated discharge planning; discharge planning; facilitators; health professional perspectives; implementation; stroke; survey; THEORETICAL DOMAINS FRAMEWORK; STROKE CARE; QUALITY; REHABILITATION; PERCEPTIONS; TRANSITIONS; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1071/IB23092
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is best practice for stroke services to coordinate discharge care plans with primary/community care providers to ensure continuity of care. This study aimed to describe health professionals' practices in stroke discharge planning within Australia and the factors influencing whether discharge planning is coordinated between hospital and primary/community care providers.Methods A mixed-methods survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework was distributed nationally to stroke health professionals regarding post-stroke discharge planning practices and factors influencing coordinated discharge planning (CDP). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.Results Data from 42 participants working in hospital-based services were analysed. Participants reported that post-stroke CDP did not consistently occur across care providers. Three themes relating to perceived CDP needs were identified: (1) a need to improve coordination between care providers, (2) service-specific management of the discharge process, and (3) addressing the needs of the stroke survivor and family. The main perceived barriers were the socio-political context and health professionals' beliefs about capabilities. The main perceived facilitators were health professionals' social/professional role and identity, knowledge, and intentions. The organisation domain was perceived as both a barrier and facilitator to CDP.Conclusion Australian health professionals working in hospital-based services believe that CDP promotes optimal outcomes for stroke survivors, but experience implementation challenges. Efforts made by organisations to ensure workplace culture and resources support the CDP process through policies and procedures may improve practice. Tailored implementation strategies need to be designed and tested to address identified barriers. Going home after a stroke is a significant milestone in the stroke recovery journey; however, stroke survivors have unmet needs in relation to discharge planning processes. Our survey found that healthcare professionals working in stroke care experience challenges in coordinating care between services, resulting in inconsistent practice. Our study suggests that clearer guidance and support is needed to improve communication between hospital-based clinicians and primary and community care providers, which will benefit outcomes for stroke survivors.This article belongs to the Collection Clinical Implementation to Optimise Outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Recommendations for the Establishment of Stroke Systems of Care: A 2019 Update A Policy Statement From the American Stroke Association
    Adeoye, Opeolu
    Nystrom, Karin V.
    Yavagal, Dileep R.
    Luciano, Jean
    Nogueira, Raul G.
    Zorowitz, Richard D.
    Khalessi, Alexander A.
    Bushnell, Cheryl
    Barsan, William G.
    Panagos, Peter
    Alberts, Mark J.
    Tiner, A. Colby
    Schwamm, Lee H.
    Jauch, Edward C.
    [J]. STROKE, 2019, 50 (07) : E187 - E210
  • [2] Studying complex caring interfaces: key issues arising from a study of multi-agency rehabilitative care for people who have suffered a stroke
    Allen, D
    Lyne, P
    Griffiths, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2002, 11 (03) : 297 - 305
  • [3] Discharge Planning of Stroke Patients: the Relatives' Perceptions of Participation
    Almborg, Ann-Helene
    Ulander, Kerstin
    Thulin, Anders
    Berg, Stig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (06) : 857 - 865
  • [4] Patients' perceptions of their participation in discharge planning after acute stroke
    Almborg, Ann-Helene
    Ulander, Kerstin
    Thulin, Anders
    Berg, Stig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (02) : 199 - 209
  • [5] The Quality of Discharge Care Planning in Acute Stroke Care: Influencing Factors and Association with Postdischarge Outcomes
    Andrew, Nadine E.
    Busingye, Doreen
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Kilkenny, Monique F.
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 27 (03) : 583 - 590
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management
  • [7] The integrated care pathway for managing post stroke patients (iCaPPS©) in public primary care Healthcentres in Malaysia: impact on quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost effectiveness analysis
    Aziz, Aznida Firzah Abdul
    Nordin, Nor Azlin Mohd
    Nur, Amrizal Muhd
    Sulong, Saperi
    Aljunid, Syed Mohamed
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice
    Baker, Richard
    Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette
    Gillies, Clare
    Shaw, Elizabeth J.
    Cheater, Francine
    Flottorp, Signe
    Robertson, Noelle
    Wensing, Michel
    Fiander, Michelle
    Eccles, Martin P.
    Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
    van Lieshout, Jan
    Jaeger, Cornelia
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04):
  • [9] Metropolitan-rural divide for stroke outcomes: do stroke units make a difference?
    Cadilhac, D. A.
    Kilkenny, M. F.
    Longworth, M.
    Pollack, M. R. P.
    Levi, C. R.
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 41 (04) : 321 - 326
  • [10] Cadilhac D.A., 2023, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, DOI [10.26188/24790896, DOI 10.26188/24790896]