Integrated nutrient management on oat plus grasspea intercropping system: an evaluation of system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint

被引:2
作者
Biswas, Saikat [1 ,3 ]
Das, Rupa [2 ]
Jana, Kalyan [1 ,4 ]
Puste, Anandamoy [1 ]
机构
[1] Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Dept Agron, Nadia 741252, West Bengal, India
[2] Usha Martin Univ, Fac Agr, Ranchi 835103, Jharkhand, India
[3] Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educ & Res Inst, Fac Ctr Agr Rural & Tribal Dev, Div Agr, Ranchi 834008, Jharkhand, India
[4] Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, AICRP Forage Crops & Utilizat, Directorate Res, Kalyani 741235, West Bengal, India
关键词
Carbon footprint; Economic profitability; Energy; Grasspea; Intercropping; Integrated nutrient management; Oat; System productivity; GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; ENERGY USE PATTERN; PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE; USE EFFICIENCY; NITROGEN; YIELD; WHEAT; PROFITABILITY; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-66107-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A field investigation took place at Central Research Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India during winter seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 with the aim to evaluate system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint (CF) of oat + grasspea intercropping systems under different integrated nutrient managements (INM). The experiment was executed in split-plot design with 4 cropping systems in main plots and 4 levels of nutrient management in sub plots. The 3:3 intercropping system of oat + grasspea ensured highest system productivity, whereas sole grasspea stood best in terms of economics, energetics and environment safety by lowering CF. Notably, INM involving 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost registered significantly higher system productivity in case of 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system (CS4N3) (18.77 q ha-1). Further, this intercropping system yielded high economic profitability (net return: US$ 430.4 ha-1, benefit-cost ratio: 1.71) as well as energy indices (energy output: 71179.1 MJ ha-1, net energy gain: 60352.0 MJ ha-1, energy ratio: 6.57 and energy profitability: 5.57). CF was also found relatively low under CS4N3 (Yield scaled CF: 62.2 kg CO2-e q-1). Furthermore, high carbon efficiency (7.92) and carbon sustainability index (6.92) were also exhibited by CS4N3 as it produced maximum carbon output (1801.2 kg ha-1). In conclusion, the 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system using INM can be viable option to ensure economic and energy viability and minimize greenhouse gas emissions without compromising system productivity. Particularly, this intercropping system combined with 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost as INM option can be recommended for the cereal and legume growers of India, specifically under intensive cropping scenario.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Energetics, GHG emissions and economics in nitrogen management practices under potato cultivation: a farm-level study [J].
Banerjee H. ;
Sarkar S. ;
Ray K. .
Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2017, 2 (4) :250-258
[2]  
Barnali Mal Barnali Mal, 2014, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V5, P168
[3]   Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rainfed soybean-wheat system of the Indian Himalayas [J].
Bhattacharyya, Ranjan ;
Kundu, S. ;
Prakash, Ved ;
Gupta, H. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 28 (01) :33-46
[4]  
Billore SD, 2005, INDIAN J AGR SCI, V75, P644
[5]  
Biswas S, 2019, Deleted Journal, V8, P368
[6]  
Biswas S, 2020, Journal of Crop and Weed, V16, P233, DOI [10.22271/09746315.2020.v16.i2.1342, 10.22271/09746315.2020.v16.i2.1342]
[7]  
Biswas S., 2023, Legume Res.-An Int. J, V1, P1
[8]   Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation [J].
Chaudhary, V. P. ;
Singh, K. K. ;
Pratibha, G. ;
Bhattacharyya, Ranjan ;
Shamim, M. ;
Srinivas, I. ;
Patel, Anurag .
ENERGY, 2017, 130 :307-317
[9]  
Choudhary Anil K., 2021, Potato Journal (Shimla), V48, P148
[10]  
Choudhary V. K., 2014, SAARC Journal of Agriculture, V12, P52, DOI 10.3329/sja.v12i2.21916