Determinants of innovation cooperation for manufacturing SMEs: evidence from a systematic review of the literature (1992–2015)

被引:0
作者
Cloutier A. [1 ]
Amara N. [2 ]
机构
[1] École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, 315, Rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, H2X 3X2, QC
[2] Faculté des Sciences de l’Administration, Université Laval, 2325, Rue De La Terrasse, Québec, G1V 0A6, QC
基金
加拿大魁北克医学研究基金会;
关键词
collaboration; cooperation; determinants; firms; innovation; management; manufacturing; research agenda; research and development; SME; systematic review; technology;
D O I
10.1504/IJMPT.2023.10052217
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper summarises a comprehensive and systematic review of 29 quantitative studies from peer-reviewed journals published in ranked publications between 1992 to 2015 on the determinants of innovation cooperation for manufacturing SMEs. Applying a documented methodology, it crystallises acquired knowledge by identifying, synthesising and discussing 220 unique determinants stemming from a vast and heterogeneous body of literature. The article introduces an analytical framework integrating different perspectives to approach this concept presenting a holistic and integrated view of the topic. It provides a typology that sorts the determinants into six categories: 1) environmental characteristics; 2) industrial characteristics; 3) organisational characteristics; 4) individual characteristics; 5) partnership characteristics; 6) project characteristics. This systematic review also identifies current gaps in the literature. The provided research perspectives will allow researchers and policymakers to better foster innovation and guide researchers addressing this phenomenon in the future. It clearly lays a foundation for future research on the topic, organising and building upon the literature that has been published so far. Copyright © 2023 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 192
页数:40
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P., R&D spillovers and recipient firm size, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 2, pp. 336-340, (1994)
[2]  
Antolin-Lopez R., Martinez-del-Rio J., Cespedes-Lorente J.J., Perez-Valls M., The choice of suitable cooperation partners for product innovation: differences between new ventures and established companies [Article], European Management Journal, 33, 6, pp. 472-484, (2015)
[3]  
Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List 2013, (2013)
[4]  
Barge-Gil A., Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: an empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior, Technovation, 30, 3, pp. 195-206, (2010)
[5]  
Barge-Gil A., Open, semi-open and closed innovators: towards an explanation of degree of openness [Article] [Web of Science EN Tri 1], Industry and Innovation, 17, 6, pp. 577-607, (2010)
[6]  
BarNir A., Smith K.A., Interfirm alliances in the small business: the role of social networks, Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 3, pp. 219-232, (2002)
[7]  
Bayona C., Garcia-Marco T., Huerta E., Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms [#5], Research Policy, 30, 8, pp. 1289-1307, (2001)
[8]  
Becheikh N., Landry R., Amara N., Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003, Technovation, 26, 5–6, pp. 644-664, (2006)
[9]  
Belderbos R., Carree M., Diederen B., Lokshin B., Veugelers R., Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 8–9, pp. 1237-1263, (2004)
[10]  
Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B., Sastre J.F., Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 1, pp. 123-137, (2015)