Comparative Analysis of Battery Cycle Life Early Prediction Using Machine Learning Pipeline

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Huang [1 ,2 ]
Altaf, Faisal [1 ]
Wik, Torsten [2 ]
Gros, Sebastien [3 ]
机构
[1] Volvo Grp Trucks Technol, Dept Electromobil, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Engn Cybernet, Trondheim, Norway
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2023年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词
Computational intelligence in control; lithium-ion battery; cycle life early prediction; uncertainty quantification; prediction intervals; REMAINING USEFUL LIFE; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; PROGNOSTICS; CELL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.1545
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Lithium-Ion battery system is one of the most critical but expensive components for both electric vehicles and stationary energy storage applications. In this regard, accurate and reliable early prediction of battery lifetime is important for optimizing life cycle management of batteries from cradle to grave. In particular, accurate aging diagnostics and prognostics is crucial for ensuring longevity, performance, safety, uptime, productivity, and profitability over a battery's lifetime. However, current state-of-art methods do not provide satisfactory prediction performance (lack of uncertainty quantification) using early degradation data. In the present work, to produce the best model for both battery cycle life point prediction and range prediction (i.e., confidence intervals or prediction intervals), a pipeline-based approach is proposed, in which a full 33-feature set is generated manually based on battery degradation knowledge, and then used to learn the best model among five machine learning (ML) models that have been reported in the battery lifetime prediction literature, and two quantile regression models for battery cycle life prediction. The calibration and sharpness property of battery cycle life range prediction is properly evaluated by their coverage probability and width respectively. The experimental results show that the gradient boosting regression tree model provides the best point prediction performance, while the quantile regression forest model provides the best range prediction performance with both full 33-feature set and the MIT 6-feature set.
引用
收藏
页码:3757 / 3763
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARATIVE RISK ANALYSIS ON PREDICTION OF DIABETES MELLITUS USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH
    Swain, Aparimita
    Mohanty, Sachi Nandan
    Das, Ananta Chandra
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS, AND OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES (ICEEOT), 2016, : 3312 - 3317
  • [32] An Empirical Comparative Analysis Using Machine Learning Techniques for Liver Disease Prediction
    Alghobiri, Mohammed
    Khan, Hikmat Ullah
    Mahmood, Ahsan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2021, 16 (04)
  • [33] A Sequential Comparative Analysis of Software Change Proneness Prediction Using Machine Learning
    Abbas, Raja
    Albalooshi, Fawzi Abdulaziz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE INNOVATION, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [34] A comparative analysis of the influence of data-processing on battery health prediction by two machine learning algorithms
    Sudarshan, Meghana
    Gautam, Ritesh
    Singh, Mahavir
    Garcia, R. Edwin
    Tomar, Vikas
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 104
  • [35] Machine learning based swift online capacity prediction of lithium-ion battery through whole cycle life
    Xue, Qiao
    Li, Junqiu
    Xu, Peipei
    ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [36] Airfield pavement condition prediction with machine learning models for life-cycle cost analysis
    Clemmensen, April
    Wang, Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [37] Data processing pipeline for cardiogenic shock prediction using machine learning
    Jajcay, Nikola
    Bezak, Branislav
    Segev, Amitai
    Matetzky, Shlomi
    Jankova, Jana
    Spartalis, Michael
    El Tahlawi, Mohammad
    Guerra, Federico
    Friebel, Julian
    Thevathasan, Tharusan
    Berta, Imrich
    Poelzl, Leo
    Naegele, Felix
    Pogran, Edita
    Cader, F. Aaysha
    Jarakovic, Milana
    Gollmann-Tepekoeylue, Can
    Kollarova, Marta
    Petrikova, Katarina
    Tica, Otilia
    Krychtiuk, Konstantin A.
    Tavazzi, Guido
    Skurk, Carsten
    Huber, Kurt
    Boehm, Allan
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [38] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Based Water Pipeline Leak Detection Using EDFL Sensor
    Rajasekaran, Uma
    Kothandaraman, Mohanaprasad
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2023, 14 (04)
  • [39] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rainfall Prediction
    Patil, Rudragoud
    Bedekar, Gayatri
    INNOVATIVE DATA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATION, ICIDCA 2021, 2022, 96 : 833 - 842
  • [40] Comparative analysis of machine learning models for rainfall prediction
    Das, Pritee Krishna
    Sahu, Rajiv Lochan
    Swain, Prakash Chandra
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2024, 264