Comparison of tab-to-busbar ultrasonic joints for electric vehicle li-ion battery applications

被引:27
作者
Das A. [1 ]
Barai A. [1 ]
Masters I. [1 ]
Williams D. [1 ]
机构
[1] WMG, The University of Warwick, Coventry
关键词
Electric vehicle; Electrical resistance; Temperature rise; Thin metal film; Ultrasonic metal welding;
D O I
10.3390/wevj10030055
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent uptake in the use of lithium-ion battery packs within electric vehicles has drawn significant attention to the selection of busbar material and corresponding thickness, which are usually based on mechanical, electrical and thermal characteristics of the welded joints, material availability and cost. To determine joint behaviour corresponding to critical-to-quality criteria, this study uses one of the widely used joining technologies, ultrasonic metal welding (UMW), to produce tab-to-busbar joints using copper and aluminium busbars of varying thicknesses. Joints for electrical and thermal characterisation were selected based on the satisfactory mechanical strength determined from the T-peel tests. Electrical contact resistance and corresponding temperature rise at the joints were compared for different tab-to-busbar joints by passing current through the joints. The average resistance or temperature increase from the 0.3 mm Al tab was 0.6 times higher than the 0.3 mm Cu[Ni] tab, irrespective of busbar selection. © 2019 by the authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Faria R., Moura P., Delgado J., de Almeida A.T., A Sustainability Assessment of Electric Vehicles as a Personal Mobility System, Energy Convers. Manag, 61, pp. 19-30, (2012)
[2]  
Das A., Li D., Williams D., Greenwood D., Joining Technologies for Automotive Battery Systems Manufacturing, World Electr. Veh. J, 9, (2018)
[3]  
Union E., Regulation (Eu) No 333/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 Amending Regulation (Ec) No 443/2009 to Define the Modalities for Reaching the 2020 Target to Reduce Co 2 Emissions from New Passenger Cars, Off. J. Eur. Union, 103, pp. 15-21, (2014)
[4]  
Union E., Comparative Study on the Differences between the EU and US Legislation on Emissions in the Automotive Sector, (2016)
[5]  
Thackeray M.M., Wolverton C., Isaacs E.D., Electrical Energy Storage for Transportation-Approaching the Limits of, and Going Beyond, Lithium-Ion Batteries, Energy Environ. Sci, 5, pp. 7854-7863, (2012)
[6]  
Das A., Li D., Williams D., Greenwood D., Weldability and Shear Strength Feasibility Study for Automotive Electric Vehicle Battery Tab Interconnects, J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng, 41, (2019)
[7]  
Lee S.S., Kim T.H., Hu S.J., Cai W.W., Abell J.A., Joining Technologies for Automotive Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturing: A Review, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, (2010)
[8]  
Kirkpatrick L., Aluminum Electrical Conductor Handbook, (1989)
[9]  
Pryor L., Schlobohm R., Brownell B., A Comparison of Aluminum vs. Copper as Used in Electrical Equipment, (2008)
[10]  
Fuhrmann T., Schlegel S., Grossmann S., Hoidis M., Comparison between Nickel and Silver as Coating Materials of Conductors Made of Copper or Aluminum Used in Electric Power Engineering, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Electrical Contacts, (2014)