Metal Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Process Development Using Optical Tomography

被引:1
作者
Bjoerkstrand, Roy [1 ]
Akmal, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Salmi, Mika [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Espoo 02150, Finland
[2] Electro Opt Syst Finland Oy, EOS Met Mat, Lemminkaisenkatu 36, Turku 20520, Finland
关键词
additive manufacturing; 3D printing; stainless steel; process monitoring; parameter engineering; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; EVOLUTION; DEFECTS; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/ma17071461
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, a set of 316 L stainless steel test specimens was additively manufactured by laser-based Powder Bed Fusion. The process parameters were varied for each specimen in terms of laser scan speed and laser power. The objective was to use a narrow band of parameters well inside the process window, demonstrating detailed parameter engineering for specialized additive manufacturing cases. The process variation was monitored using Optical Tomography to capture light emissions from the layer surfaces. Process emission values were stored in a statistical form. Micrographs were prepared and analyzed for defects using optical microscopy and image manipulation. The results of two data sources were compared to find correlations between lack of fusion, porosity, and layer-based energy emissions. A data comparison of Optical Tomography data and micrograph analyses shows that Optical Tomography can partially be used independently to develop new process parameters. The data show that the number of critical defects increases when the average Optical Tomography grey value passes a certain threshold. This finding can contribute to accelerating manufacturing parameter development and help meet the industrial need for agile component-specific parameter development.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Akmal J., 2023, P NORDIC LASER MAT P, P11
  • [2] Switchover to industrial additive manufacturing: dynamic decision-making for problematic spare parts
    Akmal, Jan Sher
    Salmi, Mika
    Bjorkstrand, Roy
    Partanen, Jouni
    Holmstrom, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 42 (13) : 358 - 384
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, ASTM F3637-23
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Together We Exceed Any Limitations of 3D Printing
  • [5] Bamberg J., 2016, P 19 WORLD C NONDEST
  • [6] The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push
    Baumers, Martin
    Dickens, Phil
    Tuck, Chris
    Hague, Richard
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 102 : 193 - 201
  • [7] A review of in-situ monitoring and process control system in metal-based laser additive manufacturing
    Cai, Yuhua
    Xiong, Jun
    Chen, Hui
    Zhang, Guangjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2023, 70 : 309 - 326
  • [8] Process parameter optimization of metal additive manufacturing: a review and outlook
    Chia, Hou Yi
    Wu, Jianzhao
    Wang, Xinzhi
    Yan, Wentao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS INFORMATICS, 2022, 2 (04):
  • [9] Cola M., 2018, In-Situ Process Mapping Using Thermal Quality Signatures during Additive Manufacturing with Titanium Alloy Ti6Al4V
  • [10] Opportunities and challenges of quality engineering for additive manufacturing
    Colosimo, Bianca M.
    Huang, Qiang
    Dasgupta, Tirthankar
    Tsung, Fugee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 50 (03) : 233 - 252