Identifying and Interpreting Hydrological Model Structural Nonstationarity Using the Bayesian Model Averaging Method

被引:1
作者
Gui, Ziling [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yue, Kedong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lu, Xiaorong [5 ]
Chen, Lin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Hao [6 ]
机构
[1] Changjiang Survey Planning Design & Res Co Ltd, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
[2] Protect Minist Water Resources, Key Lab Changjiang Regulat, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Prov Engn Res Ctr Comprehens Water Environm, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
[4] Hubei Key Lab Basin Water Secur, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Precis Measurement Sci & Technol, Key Lab Environm & Disaster Monitoring & Evaluat H, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
[6] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hydrological response; model structural nonstationarity; climate change; Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method; mechanism; PROLONGED METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT; WATER STORAGE CAPACITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RUNOFF; STREAMFLOW; QUANTIFICATION; ASSIMILATION; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3390/w16081126
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding hydrological nonstationarity under climate change is important for runoff prediction and it enables more robust decisions. Regarding the multiple structural hypotheses, this study aims to identify and interpret hydrological structural nonstationarity using the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method by (i) constructing a nonstationary model through the Bayesian weighted averaging of two lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff (RR) models (the Xinanjiang and GR4J model) with time-varying weights; and (ii) detecting the temporal variation in the optimized Bayesian weights under climate change conditions. By combining the BMA method with period partition and time sliding windows, the efficacy of adopting time-varying model structures is investigated over three basins located in the U.S. and Australia. The results show that (i) the nonstationary ensemble-averaged model with time-varying weights surpasses both individual models and the ensemble-averaged model with time-invariant weights, improving NSE[Q] from 0.04 to 0.15; (ii) the optimized weights of Xinanjiang model increase and that of GR4J declines with larger precipitation, and vice versa; (iii) the change in the optimized weights is proportional to that of precipitation under monotonic climate change, as otherwise the mechanism changes significantly. Overall, it is recommended to adopt nonstationary structures in hydrological modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments
    Abrahart, RJ
    See, L
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (04) : 655 - 670
  • [2] THE ROLE OF THE POSTAUDIT IN MODEL VALIDATION
    ANDERSON, MP
    WOESSNER, WW
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1992, 15 (03) : 167 - 173
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Water Availability in the Murray-Darling Basin: A Report from CSIRO to the Australian Government
  • [4] A comparative analysis of 9 multi-model averaging approaches in hydrological continuous streamflow simulation
    Arsenault, Richard
    Gatien, Philippe
    Renaud, Benoit
    Brissette, Francois
    Martel, Jean-Luc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 : 754 - 767
  • [5] Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods
    Broderick, Ciaran
    Matthews, Tom
    Wilby, Robert L.
    Bastola, Satish
    Murphy, Conor
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (10) : 8343 - 8373
  • [6] Chamberlin T.C., 1890, SCIENCE, V366, p92e96, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.NS-15.366.92
  • [7] Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework
    Choi, Hyung Tae
    Beven, Keith
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 332 (3-4) : 316 - 336
  • [8] Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling
    Clark, Martyn P.
    Kavetski, Dmitri
    Fenicia, Fabrizio
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [9] Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models
    Clark, Martyn P.
    Slater, Andrew G.
    Rupp, David E.
    Woods, Ross A.
    Vrugt, Jasper A.
    Gupta, Hoshin V.
    Wagener, Thorsten
    Hay, Lauren E.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44
  • [10] Crash testing hydrological models in contrasted climate conditions: An experiment on 216 Australian catchments
    Coron, L.
    Andreassian, V.
    Perrin, C.
    Lerat, J.
    Vaze, J.
    Bourqui, M.
    Hendrickx, F.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48