Application of machine learning algorithms to identify people with low bone density

被引:0
作者
Xu, Rongxuan [1 ]
Chen, Yongxing [1 ]
Yao, Zhihan [1 ]
Wu, Wei [1 ]
Cui, Jiaxue [1 ]
Wang, Ruiqi [1 ]
Diao, Yizhuo [1 ]
Jin, Chenxin [1 ]
Hong, Zhijun [2 ]
Li, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Med Univ, Hlth Management Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
low bone density; osteoporosis; machine learning; blood biochemical indicators; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OLDER US ADULTS; ASSOCIATION; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; FRACTURE;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347219
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Osteoporosis is becoming more common worldwide, imposing a substantial burden on individuals and society. The onset of osteoporosis is subtle, early detection is challenging, and population-wide screening is infeasible. Thus, there is a need to develop a method to identify those at high risk for osteoporosis.Objective This study aimed to develop a machine learning algorithm to effectively identify people with low bone density, using readily available demographic and blood biochemical data.Methods Using NHANES 2017-2020 data, participants over 50 years old with complete femoral neck BMD data were selected. This cohort was randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Lasso regression selected variables for inclusion in six machine learning models built on the training data: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), naive Bayes (NB), artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF). NHANES data from the 2013-2014 cycle was used as an external validation set input into the models to verify their generalizability. Model discrimination was assessed via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and F1 score. Calibration curves evaluated goodness-of-fit. Decision curves determined clinical utility. The SHAP framework analyzed variable importance.Results A total of 3,545 participants were included in the internal validation set of this study, of whom 1870 had normal bone density and 1,675 had low bone density Lasso regression selected 19 variables. In the test set, AUC was 0.785 (LR), 0.780 (SVM), 0.775 (GBM), 0.729 (NB), 0.771 (ANN), and 0.768 (RF). The LR model has the best discrimination and a better calibration curve fit, the best clinical net benefit for the decision curve, and it also reflects good predictive power in the external validation dataset The top variables in the LR model were: age, BMI, gender, creatine phosphokinase, total cholesterol and alkaline phosphatase.Conclusion The machine learning model demonstrated effective classification of low BMD using blood biomarkers. This could aid clinical decision making for osteoporosis prevention and management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy
    Ahluwalia, Namanjeet
    Dwyer, Johanna
    Terry, Ana
    Moshfegh, Alanna
    Johnson, Clifford
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2016, 7 (01) : 121 - 134
  • [2] Pathophysiology and treatment of osteoporosis: challenges for clinical practice in older people
    Barnsley, J.
    Buckland, G.
    Chan, P. E.
    Ong, A.
    Ramos, A. S.
    Baxter, M.
    Laskou, F.
    Dennison, E. M.
    Cooper, C.
    Patel, Harnish P.
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (04) : 759 - 773
  • [3] Bone turnover markers for osteoporotic status assessment? A systematic review of their diagnosis value at baseline in osteoporosis
    Biver, Emmanuel
    Chopin, Florence
    Coiffier, Guillaume
    Brentano, Thomas Funck
    Bouvard, Beatrice
    Garnero, Patrick
    Cortet, Bernard
    [J]. JOINT BONE SPINE, 2012, 79 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [4] Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities
    Borgstrom, Fredrik
    Karlsson, Linda
    Ortsater, Gustav
    Norton, Nicolas
    Halbout, Philippe
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Lorentzon, Mattias
    McCloskey, Eugene, V
    Harvey, Nicholas C.
    Javaid, Muhamamd K.
    Kanis, John A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [5] Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
    Chen, Hongyi
    Liu, Yuanchang
    Balabani, Stavroula
    Hirayama, Ryuji
    Huang, Jie
    [J]. RESEARCH, 2023, 6
  • [6] Association between lipid profiles and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis
    Chen, Y. -Y.
    Wang, W. -W.
    Yang, L.
    Chen, W. -W.
    Zhang, H. -X.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [7] Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning
    Choi, Rene Y.
    Coyner, Aaron S.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Campbell, J. Peter
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [8] The epidemiology of osteoporosis
    Clynes, Michael A.
    Harvey, Nicholas C.
    Curtis, Elizabeth M.
    Fuggle, Nicholas R.
    Dennison, Elaine M.
    Cooper, Cyrus
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2020, 133 (01) : 105 - 117
  • [9] Systemic immune-inflammation index acts as a novel diagnostic biomarker for postmenopausal osteoporosis and could predict the risk of osteoporotic fracture
    Fang, Hong
    Zhang, Hanqing
    Wang, Zhi
    Zhou, Zhongming
    Li, Yunjun
    Lu, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2020, 34 (01)
  • [10] A negative association between total cholesterol and bone mineral density in US adult women
    Fang, Weihua
    Peng, Peng
    Xiao, Fangjun
    He, Wei
    Wei, Qiushi
    He, Mincong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 9