Large-scale evidence for logarithmic effects of word predictability on reading time

被引:29
作者
Shain, Cory [1 ]
Meister, Clara [2 ]
Pimentel, Tiago [3 ]
Cotterell, Ryan [2 ]
Levy, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Machine Learning, Dept Comp Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Comp Sci & Technol, Cambridge CB3 0FD, England
关键词
language; prediction; reading; nonlinear regression; human language processing; EYE-MOVEMENTS; GARDEN-PATH; ATTACHMENT AMBIGUITIES; LANGUAGE; INFORMATION; PREDICTION; MEMORY; BRAIN; COMPREHENSION; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2307876121
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
During real-time language comprehension, our minds rapidly decode complex meanings from sequences of words. The difficulty of doing so is known to be related to words' contextual predictability, but what cognitive processes do these predictability effects reflect? In one view, predictability effects reflect facilitation due to anticipatory processing of words that are predictable from context. This view predicts a linear effect of predictability on processing demand. In another view, predictability effects reflect the costs of probabilistic inference over sentence interpretations. This view predicts either a logarithmic or a superlogarithmic effect of predictability on processing demand, depending on whether it assumes pressures toward a uniform distribution of information over time. The empirical record is currently mixed. Here, we revisit this question at scale: We analyze six reading datasets, estimate next -word probabilities with diverse statistical language models, and model reading times using recent advances in nonlinear regression. Results support a logarithmic effect of word predictability on processing difficulty, which favors probabilistic inference as a key component of human language processing.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]  
Ait-Mokhtar S., 2002, Natural Language Engineering, V8, P121, DOI 10.1017/S1351324902002887
[2]   AVOIDING THE GARDEN PATH - EYE-MOVEMENTS IN CONTEXT [J].
ALTMANN, GTM ;
GARNHAM, A ;
DENNIS, Y .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (05) :685-712
[3]   Ambiguity in sentence processing [J].
Altmann, GTM .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (04) :146-152
[4]   Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference [J].
Altmann, GTM ;
Kamide, Y .
COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) :247-264
[5]   Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of constituent ordering [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Wasow, T ;
Asudeh, A ;
Alrenga, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 51 (01) :55-70
[6]  
Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI [10.1007/s13201-024-02166-7, 10.3390/agronomy15020428]
[7]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[8]  
Boyce V., 2023, Glossa Psycholinguistics, V2
[9]   Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty [J].
Boyce, Veronica ;
Futrell, Richard ;
Levy, Roger P. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2020, 111
[10]   Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension [J].
Brothers, Trevor ;
Kuperberg, Gina R. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2021, 116