Spatial differences, dynamic evolution and influencing factors of China's construction industry carbon emission efficiency

被引:13
|
作者
Ni, Guodong [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Yaqi [1 ]
Niu, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Lei [3 ]
Song, Changfu [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Wenshun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Res Ctr Digitalized Construct & Knowledge Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
[3] Dongtai State Owned Assets Operat Grp Co Ltd, Yancheng 224299, Peoples R China
[4] China Railway 20TH Bur Grp Real Estate Dev Co Ltd, Chongqing 400065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Construction industry carbon emission; efficiency; Spatial differences; Dynamic evolution; Influencing factors; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY; PERSPECTIVE; DISTANCE; FRONTIER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141593
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Improving the construction industry carbon emission efficiency (CICEE) is crucial for achieving sustainable development. To promote low-carbon development in the construction industry, it is essential to measure carbon emission efficiency (CEE) and analyze spatial differences, dynamic evolution, and influencing factors. This study measures CICEE in 30 provinces in China from 2005 to 2019 and evaluates CEE using the minimum distance to a strong efficient frontier (MinDS) model with undesirable outputs. Subsequently, the Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition, as well as spatial autocorrelation analysis, are used to explore the sources of spatial differences and the spatial clustering pattern of CEE. The dynamic trend of CEE is analyzed through kernel density estimation, traditional and spatial Markov chains. Finally, geographical detectors are used to detect the explanatory factors and their interactions on spatial differences in CEE. The results of this study show that the CICEE presents an increasing and then decreasing trend, with the highest CEE in the eastern region, followed by the central and northeastern regions, and the lowest in the western region. Additionally, the eastern region exhibits the highest intra-regional differences and the highest inter-regional differences with the western region. Meanwhile, CEE shows a positive spatial correlation, with high-high (H-H) clustering in the eastern region and low-low (L-L) clustering in the western and northeastern regions. Polarization has been evident throughout the entire country and its four regions in recent years. It is challenging to achieve the CEE transfer through rapid advancement, and the efficiency of neighboring provinces will influence the potential transfer of the local province. Finally, factors such as enterprise scale, economic development level, degree of openness to the outside world, innovation level, industrial structure, and energy consumption structure all affect the spatial differences in CEE, with the interaction effect being higher than the single factor. This study presents a novel computational model to measure CICEE, analyzes the structural factors contributing to the spatial differences in CICEE, and provides theoretical support for the synergistic improvement of CEE across different regions. Combining with spatial autocorrelation analysis, the spatial distribution characteristics of CICEE are analyzed from the static level. This study provides a comprehensive examination of the evolution trend of CICEE, focusing on its dynamic evolution characteristics and the long-term transfer dimension. Additionally, geographical detector technology is introduced for the first time to analyze the influencing factors of spatial differences in CICEE. providing scientific evidence for the sustainable and coordinated development of different regions in China's construction industry. Furthermore, this study also contributes to the development of varied strategies for improving CICEE in China.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatial Differences, Dynamic Evolution, and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission Efficiency in National High-Tech Zones
    Li, Chunling
    Han, Jun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [22] Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of China's Construction Industry Carbon Intensity
    Du, Qiang
    Wu, Min
    Wang, Ning
    Bai, Libiao
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2017, 26 (06): : 2507 - 2521
  • [23] Study on Carbon Emission and Its Influencing Factors in China's Tourism Industry
    Liu, Tian
    Yang, Tianchao
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (06): : 6259 - 6265
  • [24] Evolution and Influencing Factors of Spatial Correlation Network of Construction Carbon Emission in China from the Perspective of Whole Life Cycle
    Ren X.-S.
    Li Z.-R.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (03): : 1243 - 1253
  • [25] Study on the Change in the Total Factor Carbon Emission Efficiency of China's Transportation Industry and Its Influencing Factors
    Jiang, Meiru
    Li, Jiachen
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (22)
  • [26] The Impact of Green Taxes on the Carbon Emission Efficiency of China's Construction Industry
    Zhou, Yingbin
    Lv, Siqi
    Wang, Jianlin
    Tong, Junbo
    Fang, Zhong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [27] Spatiotemporal differences in and influencing factors of urban carbon emission efficiency in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Zhaofeng Wang
    Haiqin Shao
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 121713 - 121733
  • [28] Spatiotemporal differences in and influencing factors of urban carbon emission efficiency in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wang, Zhaofeng
    Shao, Haiqin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (58) : 121713 - 121733
  • [29] Spatial Correlation Network Structure of Carbon Emission Efficiency in China's Construction Industry and Its Formation Mechanism
    Gao, Haidong
    Li, Tiantian
    Yu, Jing
    Sun, Yangrui
    Xie, Shijie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [30] RESEARCH ON CHINA'S TOURISM CARBON EMISSION EFFICIENCY AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS
    Shen, Qiaoqiao
    Sun, Tao
    Luo, Kangming
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (09): : 6380 - 6388