Supplier selection for an industry using MCDM techniques

被引：7
作者：
Kumar Behera D. [1 ,2 ]
Beura S. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang, Odisha, Dhenkanal
[2] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang, Odisha, Dhenkanal
来源：
Materials Today: Proceedings | 2023年 / 74卷
关键词：
AHP; MCDM; MEREC; PIV; TOPSIS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.291
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The planning and management of both the actual physical transportation of commodities and the resources employed in the supply process, from raw materials to consumable products, falls under the purview of supply chain management (SCM). However, the demand for collaboration among all components of a supply chain has grown as a result of the always evolving business market difficulties. For decision science experts, the task of allocating orders to providers in order to satisfy various criteria is increasingly perplexing and challenging. Therefore, in order to aid in the decision-making process for the appropriate supplier selection, we apply innovative methodologies known as the multi-criteria approaches. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and MEthod based on Removal are two Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies that we first employ in this study. © 2022
引用
收藏
页码：901 / 909
页数：8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Janvier-James A.M., A new introduction to supply chains and supply chain management: Definitions and theories perspective, Int. Bus. Res., 5, 1, pp. 194-207, (2012)
  • [2] Zandieh M., Aslani B., A hybrid MCDM approach for order distribution in a multiple-supplier supply chain: A case study, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 16, (2019)
  • [3] Emovon I., Oghenenyerovwho O.S., Application of MCDM method in material selection for optimal design: A review, Results in Materials, 7, (2020)
  • [4] Mufazzal S., Muzakkir S.M., A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals, Comput. Ind. Eng., 119, pp. 427-438, (2018)
  • [5] Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M., Amiri M., Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Antucheviciene J., Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC), Symmetry, 13, 4, (2021)
  • [6] Belton V., Goodwin P., Remarks on the application of the analytic hierarchy process to judgmental forecasting, Int. J. Forecast., 12, 1, pp. 155-161, (1996)
  • [7] Belton V., Gear T., The legitimacy of rank reversal–A comment, Omega, 13, 3, pp. 143-144, (1985)
  • [8] Garcia-Cascales M.S., Lamata M.T., On rank reversal and TOPSIS method, Math. Comput. Model., 56, 5-6, pp. 123-132, (2012)
  • [9] Khan N.Z., Ansari T.S.A., Siddiquee A.N., Khan Z.A., Selection of E-learning websites using a novel Proximity Indexed Value (PIV) MCDM method, Journal of Computers in Education, 6, 2, pp. 241-256, (2019)
  • [10] Raigar J., Sharma V.S., Srivastava S., Chand R., Singh J., A decision support system for the selection of an additive manufacturing process using a new hybrid MCDM technique, Sādhanā, 45, 1, pp. 1-14, (2020)
123