A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery

被引:2
作者
Esene, Ignatius [1 ,2 ]
Tantengco, Ourlad Alzeus G. [3 ]
Robertson, Faith C. [4 ]
Still, Megan E. H. [5 ]
Ukachukwu, Alvan-Emeka K. [6 ]
Baticulon, Ronnie E. [7 ]
Barthelemy, Ernest J. [8 ]
Perez-Chadid, Daniela [9 ]
Lippa, Laura [10 ]
Silva, Ana Cristina Veiga [11 ]
Jokonya, Luxwell [12 ]
Hassani, Fahd D. [13 ]
Nicolosi, Federico [14 ]
Takoutsing, Berjo D. [2 ]
Ntalaja, Jeff [15 ]
Hoz, Samer S. [16 ]
Kalangu, Kazadi K. N. [12 ]
Dechambenoit, Gilbert [17 ]
Servadei, Franco [18 ]
El Abbadi, Najia [13 ]
Park, Kee B. [19 ]
Kolias, Angelos [20 ,21 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bamenda, Fac Hlth Sci, Neurosurg Div, Bambili, Cameroon
[2] Winners Fdn, Res Div, Yaounde, Cameroon
[3] Univ Philippines Manila, Coll Med, Dept Physiol, Manila, Philippines
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Neurosurg, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Durham, NC USA
[7] Univ Philippines, Philippine Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosci, Div Neurosurg, Manila, Philippines
[8] SUNY Downstate Hlth Sci Univ, Div Neurosurg, Global Neurosurg Lab, Brooklyn, NY USA
[9] Univ CES, Fac Med, Medellin, Colombia
[10] ASST Osped Niguarda, Dept Neurosurg, Milan, Italy
[11] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Post Grad Program Neuropsychiat & Behav Sci PosNe, Neurosurg Dept, Recife, Brazil
[12] Univ Zimbabwe, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Harare, Zimbabwe
[13] Abulcasis Int Univ Hlth Sci, Cheikh Zaid Int Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Rabat, Morocco
[14] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Neurosurg Unit, Milan, Italy
[15] Clin Ngaliema, Kinshasa, DEM REP CONGO
[16] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Cincinnati, OH USA
[17] Ctr Med Chirurg Obstetr Cote Opale, St Martin Boulogne, France
[18] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[19] Harvard Med Sch, Program Global Surg & Social Change, Boston, MA USA
[20] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Cambridge, England
[21] Univ Cambridge, Dept Clin Neurosci, NIHR, Global Hlth Res Grp Acquired Brain & Spine Injury, Cambridge, England
关键词
Evidence-based neurosurgery; Forest plot; Meta-analysis; Neurosurgery; Surgery; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-024-06133-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionSystematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) are methods of data analysis used to synthesize information presented in multiple publications on the same topic. A thorough understanding of the steps involved in conducting this type of research and approaches to data analysis is critical for appropriate understanding, interpretation, and application of the findings of these reviews.MethodsWe reviewed reference texts in clinical neuroepidemiology, neurostatistics and research methods and other previously related articles on meta-analyses (MAs) in surgery. Based on existing theories and models and our cumulative years of expertise in conducting MAs, we have synthesized and presented a detailed pragmatic approach to interpreting MAs in Neurosurgery.ResultsHerein we have briefly defined SRs sand MAs and related terminologies, succinctly outlined the essential steps to conduct and critically appraise SRs and MAs. A practical approach to interpreting MAs for neurosurgeons is described in details. Based on summary outcome measures, we have used hypothetical examples to illustrate the Interpretation of the three commonest types of MAs in neurosurgery: MAs of Binary Outcome Measures (Pairwise MAs), MAs of proportions and MAs of Continuous Variables. Furthermore, we have elucidated on the concepts of heterogeneity, modeling, certainty, and bias essential for the robust and transparent interpretation of MAs. The basics for the Interpretation of Forest plots, the preferred graphical display of data in MAs are summarized. Additionally, a condensation of the assessment of the overall quality of methodology and reporting of MA and the applicability of evidence to patient care is presented.ConclusionThere is a paucity of pragmatic guides to appraise MAs for surgeons who are non-statisticians. This article serves as a detailed guide for the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with examples of applications for clinical neurosurgeons.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Barker Fred G 2nd, 2005, Neurosurg Focus, V19, pE5, DOI 10.3171/foc.2005.19.4.6
[2]   Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence [J].
Barker, Timothy Hugh ;
Migliavaca, Celina Borges ;
Stein, Cinara ;
Colpani, Veronica ;
Falavigna, Maicon ;
Aromataris, Edoardo ;
Munn, Zachary .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
[3]  
Borenstein M., 2009, INTRO META ANAL, DOI [10.1002/9780470743386, DOI 10.1002/9780470743386]
[4]   Commentary: Pearls for Interpreting Neurosurgical Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Lessons From a Collaborative Effort [J].
Esene, Ignatius N. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (05) :E594-E595
[5]   Case series and descriptive cohort studies in neurosurgery: the confusion and solution [J].
Esene, Ignatius N. ;
Ngu, Julius ;
El Zoghby, Mohamed ;
Solaroglu, Ihsan ;
Sikod, Anna M. ;
Kotb, Ali ;
Dechambenoit, Gilbert ;
El Husseiny, Hossam .
CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2014, 30 (08) :1321-1332
[6]  
Fleiss J L, 1993, Stat Methods Med Res, V2, P121, DOI 10.1177/096228029300200202
[7]   What is heterogeneity and is it important? [J].
Fletcher, John .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7584) :94-96
[8]   GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables [J].
Guyatt, Gordon ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Vist, Gunn ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Norris, Susan ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
deBeer, Hans ;
Jaeschke, Roman ;
Rind, David ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Dahm, Philipp ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :383-394
[9]   Commentary: Pearls for Interpreting Neurosurgical Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Lessons From a Collaborative Effort [J].
Haines, Stephen J. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (03) :E275-E276
[10]  
Higgins J. P. T., 2023, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.4