Comparing open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy - a single institution report

被引:0
作者
Roaldsen, Marius [1 ]
Lohne, Vetle [2 ]
Stenberg, Thor Allan [1 ]
Patel, Hiten R. H. [1 ,2 ]
Aarsaether, Erling [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp North Norway, Tromso, Norway
[2] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Tromso, Norway
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Nephrometry score; Nephron sparing surgery; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Renal ischemia reperfusion injury; Robot-assisted surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01586-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundOpen partial nephrectomy (OPN) has previously been considered the gold standard procedure for treatment of T1 localized renal tumors. After introduction of robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) as an alternative method to OPN, OPN was gradually abandoned at our department. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the results of patients treated with either OPN or RAPN for suspected renal carcinoma. MethodsPatients who underwent either open or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. Each tumor subjected to surgery was scored preoperatively by the RENAL nephrometry score. Complications within 30 days were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. ResultsA total of 197 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were identified; 75 were subjected to OPN and 122 were treated with RAPN. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age (OPN: 63 years +/- 11, RAPN: 62 years +/- 10), gender (OPN: 71/29%, RAPN: 67/33%), body mass index (OPN: 28 +/- 5, RAPN: 28 +/- 5), ASA score (OPN: 2.4 +/- 0.6, RAPN: 2.2 +/- 0.5), or nephrometry score (OPN: 6.6 +/- 1.7, RAPN: 6.9 +/- 1.7, p = 0.2). The operative time was significantly shorter in the OPN group (81 min) compared to the RAPN group (144.5 min, p < 0.001). Mean perioperative blood loss was 227 +/- 162 ml in the OPN group compared to 189 +/- 152 ml in the RAPN group (p = 0.1). Mean length of stay was shorter in the RAPN group (3 days) compared to the OPN group (6, days, p < 0.001). Positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the OPN group (21.6%) compared to the RAPN group (4.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo graded complications between the groups (p = 0.6). ConclusionsThe introduction of RAPN at our department resulted in shorter length of stay and fewer positive surgical margins, without increasing complications.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Positive surgical margins may not affect the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy: A meta-analysis based on 39 studies [J].
Bai, Renran ;
Gao, Liang ;
Wang, Jiawu ;
Jiang, Qing .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[2]   Next-generation biomarkers for detecting kidney toxicity [J].
Bonventre, Joseph V. ;
Vaidya, Vishal S. ;
Schmouder, Robert ;
Feig, Peter ;
Dieterle, Frank .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 28 (05) :436-440
[3]   Open Partial Nephrectomy in Renal Cancer: A Feasible Gold Standard Technique in All Hospitals [J].
Cozar, J. M. ;
Tallada, M. .
ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2008, 2008
[4]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technique and initial clinical experience with daVinci robotic system [J].
Gettman, MT ;
Blute, ML ;
Chow, GK ;
Neururer, R ;
Bartsch, G ;
Peschel, R .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (05) :914-918
[5]   Robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes. A systematic review [J].
Grivas, Nikolaos ;
Kalampokis, Nikolaos ;
Larcher, Alessandro ;
Tyritzis, Stavros ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Buffi, Nicolo ;
Ploumidis, Achilles ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Porpiglia, Francesco ;
van der Poel, Henk ;
Mottrie, Alexandre ;
de Naeyer, Geert ;
Everaerts, Wouter ;
Goonewardene, Sanchia ;
Pini, Giovannalberto ;
Ploumi-Dis, Achilles ;
Sopena, Josep Gaya ;
Lantz, Anna Wallerstedt .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) :113-120
[6]   Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Completely Endophytic Renal Tumors: A High-Volume Center Experience [J].
Gu, Liangyou ;
Liu, Kan ;
Shen, Donglai ;
Li, Hongzhao ;
Gao, Yu ;
Huang, Qingbo ;
Fan, Yang ;
Ai, Qing ;
Xie, Yongpeng ;
Yao, Yuanxin ;
Du, Songliang ;
Zhao, Xupeng ;
Wang, Baojun ;
Ma, Xin ;
Zhang, Xu .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) :581-587
[7]   The RENAL Nephrometry Score: A Comprehensive Standardized System for Quantitating Renal Tumor Size, Location and Depth [J].
Kutikov, Alexander ;
Uzzo, Robert G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (03) :844-853
[8]   Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: Technique and outcome [J].
Lamoshi, Abdulraouf Y. ;
Salkini, Mohamad W. .
UROLOGY ANNALS, 2015, 7 (02) :226-230
[9]   The Learning Curve for Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Impact of Surgical Experience on Perioperative Outcomes [J].
Larcher, Alessandro ;
Muttin, Fabio ;
Peyronnet, Benoit ;
De Naeyer, Geert ;
Khene, Zine-Eddine ;
Dell'Oglio, Paolo ;
Ferreiro, Cristina ;
Schatteman, Peter ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
D'Hondt, Frederiek ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Bensalah, Karim ;
Mottrie, Alexandre .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) :253-256
[10]   Open Versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Effect on Clinical Outcome [J].
Lee, Sangchul ;
Oh, Jongjin ;
Hong, Seong Kyu ;
Lee, Sang Eun ;
Byun, Seok-Soo .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (07) :1181-1185