Unraveling the causality between gastroesophageal reflux disease and increased cancer risk: evidence from the UK Biobank and GWAS consortia

被引:1
作者
Wu, Gujie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Yaqiong [4 ]
Ning, Dong [5 ]
Zhao, Mengnan [1 ]
Li, Xiaoqing [2 ,3 ]
Chang, Lu [6 ]
Hu, Qili [7 ]
Li, Yao [7 ]
Cheng, Lin [4 ]
Huang, Yiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Endoscopy Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Endoscopy Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Ireland NUI, Regenerat Med Inst, Sch Med, Galway, Ireland
[5] Natl Univ Ireland NUI, Sch Med, Dept Physiol, Galway, Ireland
[6] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Radiol, State Key Lab Med Neurobiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2024年 / 22卷 / 01期
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Cancer risk; Mendelian randomization; Genome-wide association studies; Lifestyle factors; MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; LUNG-CANCER; ACID REFLUX; SYMPTOMS; ASSOCIATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; INSTRUMENTS; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-024-03526-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition characterized by the reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus. Despite its widespread prevalence worldwide, the causal link between GERD and various cancer risks has not been fully established, and past medical research has often underestimated or overlooked this relationship.MethodsThis study performed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between GERD and 19 different cancers. We leveraged data from 129,080 GERD patients and 473,524 controls, along with cancer-related data, obtained from the UK Biobank and various Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) consortia. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GERD were used as instrumental variables, utilizing methods such as inverse variance weighting, weighted median, and MR-Egger to address potential pleiotropy and confounding factors.ResultsGERD was significantly associated with higher risks of nine types of cancer. Even after adjusting for all known risk factors-including smoking, alcohol consumption, major depression, and body mass index (BMI)-these associations remained significant, with higher risks for most cancers. For example, the adjusted risk for overall lung cancer was (OR, 1.23; 95% CI: 1.14-1.33), for lung adenocarcinoma was (OR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), for lung squamous cell carcinoma was (OR, 1.35; 95% CI: 1.19-1.53), and for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer was (OR, 1.73; 95% CI: 1.22-2.44). Especially noteworthy, the risk for esophageal cancer increased to (OR, 2.57; 95% CI: 1.23-5.37). Mediation analyses further highlighted GERD as a significant mediator in the relationships between BMI, smoking, major depression, and cancer risks.ConclusionsThis study identifies a significant causal relationship between GERD and increased cancer risk, highlighting its role in cancer development and underscoring the necessity of incorporating GERD management into cancer prevention strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Association Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
    Amarnath, Shivantha
    Starr, Adam
    Chukkalore, Divya
    Elfiky, Ahmed
    Abureesh, Mohammad
    Aqsa, Anum
    Singh, Chetan
    Weerasinghe, Chanudi
    Gurala, Dhineshreddy
    Demissie, Seleshi
    Deeb, Liliane
    Terjanian, Terenig
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (04) : 173 - 179
  • [2] When to use the Bonferroni correction
    Armstrong, Richard A.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (05) : 502 - 508
  • [3] Mendelian Randomization
    Birney, Ewan
    [J]. COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [4] Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption
    Bowden, Jack
    Del Greco, Fabiola M.
    Minelli, Cosetta
    Zhao, Qingyuan
    Lawlor, Debbie A.
    Sheehan, Nuala A.
    Thompson, John
    Smith, George Davey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (03) : 728 - 742
  • [5] Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator
    Bowden, Jack
    Smith, George Davey
    Haycock, Philip C.
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) : 304 - 314
  • [6] The Standardization of Linear and Nonlinear Effects in Direct and Indirect Applications of Structural Equation Mixture Models for Normal and Nonnormal Data
    Brandt, Holger
    Umbach, Nora
    Kelava, Augustin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [7] Epidemiological evidence and association of human papillomavirus with esophageal cancer in northeastern Thailand: a case-control study
    Burassakarn, Ati
    Pientong, Chamsai
    Tongchai, Panwad
    Wongjampa, Weerayut
    Poosari, Arisara
    Udomsin, Apiradee
    Sa-ngiamwibool, Prakasit
    Ungareewittaya, Piti
    Nutravong, Thitima
    Ekalaksananan, Tipaya
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Burgess S, 2017, EUR J EPIDEMIOL, V32, P377, DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x
  • [9] Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data
    Burgess, Stephen
    Butterworth, Adam
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (07) : 658 - 665
  • [10] Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
    Burgess, Stephen
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (03) : 755 - 764