Review of Deep Learning Based Autosegmentation for Clinical Target Volume: Current Status and Future Directions

被引:4
|
作者
Matoska, Thomas [1 ]
Patel, Mira [1 ]
Liu, Hefei [2 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Varian Med Syst Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Allegheny Hlth Network Canc Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
关键词
ORGANS-AT-RISK; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; AUTO-SEGMENTATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; DELINEATION; VALIDATION; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2024.101470
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Manual contour work for radiation treatment planning takes signi fi cant time to ensure volumes are accurately delineated. The use of arti fi cial intelligence with deep learning based autosegmentation (DLAS) models has made itself known in recent years to alleviate this workload. It is used for organs at risk contouring with signi fi cant consistency in performance and time saving. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of present published data for DLAS of clinical target volume (CTV) contours, identify areas of improvement, and discuss future directions. Methods and Materials: A literature review was performed by using the key words " deep learning " AND ( " segmentation " or " delineation " ) AND " clinical target volume " in an indexed search into PubMed. A total of 154 articles based on the search criteria were reviewed. The review considered the DLAS model used, disease site, targets contoured, guidelines used, and the overall performance.<br /> Results: Of the 53 articles investigating DLAS of CTV, only 6 were published before 2020. Publications have increased in recent years, with 46 articles published between 2020 and 2023. The cervix (n = 19) and the prostate (n = 12) were studied most frequently. Most studies (n = 43) involved a single institution. Median sample size was 130 patients (range, 5-1052). The most common metrics used to measure DLAS performance were Dice similarity coef fi cient followed by Hausdorff distance. Dosimetric performance was seldom reported (n = 11). There was also variability in speci fi c guidelines used (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO), and others). DLAS models had good overall performance for contouring CTV volumes for multiple disease sites, with most studies showing Dice similarity coef fi cient values > 0.7. DLAS models also delineated CTV volumes faster compared with manual contouring. However, some DLAS model contours still required at least minor edits, and future studies investigating DLAS of CTV volumes require improvement. Conclusions: DLAS demonstrates capability of completing CTV contour plans with increased ef fi ciency and accuracy. However, most models are developed and validated by single institutions using guidelines followed by the developing institutions. Publications about DLAS of the CTV have increased in recent years. Future studies and DLAS models need to include larger data sets with different patient demographics, disease stages, validation in multi-institutional settings, and inclusion of dosimetric performance. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NRG Oncology Assessment of Arti fi cial Intelligence Deep Learning - Based Autosegmentation for Radiation Therapy: Current Developments, Clinical Considerations, and Future Directions
    Rong, Yi
    Chen, Quan
    Fu, Yabo
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    Al-Hallaq, Hania A.
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yuan, Lulin
    Xiao, Ying
    Cai, Bin
    Latifi, Kujtim
    Benedict, Stanley H.
    Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C.
    Qi, X. Sharon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 119 (01): : 261 - 280
  • [2] Current Status and Future Directions of Deep Learning Applications for Safety Management in Construction
    Pham, Hieu T. T. L.
    Rafieizonooz, Mahdi
    Han, SangUk
    Lee, Dong-Eun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [3] Deep Learning in Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: Current Status and Future Directions
    Cui, Ruichen
    Wang, Lei
    Lin, Lin
    Li, Jie
    Liu, Shixiang
    Lu, Runda
    Liu, Bowei
    Gu, Yimin
    Zhang, Hanlu
    Shang, Qixin
    Chen, Longqi
    Tian, Dong
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2023, 10 (11):
  • [4] Raltitrexed: current clinical status and future directions
    Van Cutsem, E
    Cunningham, D
    Maroun, J
    Cervantes, A
    Glimelius, B
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : 513 - 522
  • [5] Application of deep learning for the analysis of stomata: a review of current methods and future directions
    Gibbs, Jonathon A.
    Burgess, Alexandra J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2024, 75 (21) : 6704 - 6718
  • [6] Current state and future directions for deep learning based automatic seismic fault interpretation: A systematic review
    An, Yu
    Du, Haiwen
    Ma, Siteng
    Niu, Yingjie
    Liu, Dairui
    Wang, Jing
    Du, Yuhan
    Childs, Conrad
    Walsh, John
    Dong, Ruihai
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2023, 243
  • [7] Deep-Learning-Based Autosegmentation Outperforms Atlas-Based Autosegmentation in a Clinical Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients
    Kleijnen, J. J. E.
    Akhiat, A.
    Hoogeman, M. S.
    Petit, S. F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E418 - E418
  • [8] Current status and future trends of clinical diagnoses via image-based deep learning
    Xu, Jie
    Xue, Kanmin
    Zhang, Kang
    THERANOSTICS, 2019, 9 (25): : 7556 - 7565
  • [9] Current Status and Future Directions for Clinical Trials Pharmacy
    La, Hyen-Oh
    Choi, Sun
    Lee, Soo-Kyung
    Ryu, Byeung-Eun
    Han, Ok-Yeon
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2011, 131 (06): : 969 - 975
  • [10] Clinical imaging of hypoxia: Current status and future directions
    Bonnitcha, Paul
    Grieve, Stuart
    Figtree, Gemma
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 126 : 296 - 312