Effects of Point Cloud Density on the Estimation Accuracy of Large-Area Subtropical Forest Inventory Attributes Using Airborne LiDAR Data

被引:2
作者
Zhou X. [1 ,2 ]
Li C. [1 ]
Dai H. [3 ]
Yu Z. [1 ,3 ]
Li Z. [3 ]
Su K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Forestry College, Guangxi University, Nanning
[2] Guangxi Natural Resources Vocational and Technical College, Fusui
[3] Guangxi Forest Inventory and Planning Institute, Nanning
来源
Linye Kexue/Scientia Silvae Sinicae | 2023年 / 59卷 / 09期
关键词
airborne LiDAR; basal area; LiDAR-derived metrics; model; stand volume;
D O I
10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20210831
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
【Objective】 Point cloud density is a critical factor affecting the cost of airborne LiDAR data acquisition and preprocessing. Therefore, exploring the influence of point cloud density on the estimation accuracy of forest inventory attributes can provide a reference for optimizing technical schemes for airborne LiDAR-based large-area forest inventory and monitoring. 【Method】 In this study, we used airborne LiDAR data and field plot data collected in a subtropical mountainous and hilly region in Guangxi, China. Firstly, the original point clouds with a density of 4.35 points∙m−2 were reduced to 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 points∙m−2 using a systematic thinning method, respectively, resulting in 11 plot-level point cloud datasets, including one full-density point cloud dataset and ten reduced-density point cloud datasets. Secondly, a paired sample t-test was used to analyze the differences in 12 LiDAR-derived metrics between reduced-density point clouds and full-density point clouds in four forest types (Chinese fir, pine, eucalyptus, and broad-leaved). Thirdly, using a multiplicative power model formulation with fixed variables and stable structure, the stand volume (VOL) and basal area (BA) were estimated using various density datasets of point clouds, respectively, and their goodness-of-fit statistics, including coefficient of determination (R2), relative root square error (rRMSE), and mean prediction error (MPE), were compared. Finally, a t-test was used to analyze the differences in the means of the estimates between the reduced-density point clouds and full-density point clouds. 【Result】 1) When the point cloud density was low, the means of the 25th, 50th, and 75th height percentiles (ph25, ph50, and ph75) of the reduced-density point clouds showed statistically significant differences from those of the corresponding variables of the full-density point clouds. However, when statistically significant differences were found for different variables in various forest types, the point cloud densities differed. There were no statistically significant differences in the means of mean point cloud height (Hmean) and coefficient of variation of point cloud height distribution (Hcv) between the reduced-density point clouds and full-density point clouds in all forest types, but there were statistically significant differences in the means of maximum height (Hmax) of point clouds between the reduced-density point clouds and full-density point clouds for all forest types. 2) The means of canopy cover (CC) and 25th density percentile (dh25) of the reduced-density point clouds were not statistically significantly different from those of the corresponding variables of the full-density point clouds for all forest types (except dh25 for broadleaf forests), but statistically significant differences existed for the 50th and 75th density percentiles (dh50 and dh75). 3) The means of the mean leaf area density (LADmean) of reduced-density point clouds were statistically significantly different from those of the LADmean of full-density point clouds in all forest types, and while the means of the coefficient of variation of leaf area density (LADcv) of reduced-density point clouds were significantly different from those of the LADcv of full-density point clouds when point cloud density was low. 4) The differences in the estimates of VOL and BA for different density point clouds were small among the forest types, and none of the estimates were statistically significantly different from each other. However, as the density of point clouds decreased, the R2 of the estimation models for VOL and BA for fir, pine, and eucalyptus forests slowly decreased, and the rRMSE and MPE slowly increased, indicating that the estimation accuracy of forest inventory attributes gradually decreased. The R2, rRMSE, and MPE of the estimation models for VOL and BA for the broad-leaved forests were not obviously affected by the change in point cloud density. 【Conclusion】 The decrease in the density of point clouds leads to an increase in the standard deviation of the LiDAR-derived metrics, which is the main reason for the decrease in the estimation accuracy of forest inventory attributes. In the operational forest resources investigation and monitoring, the airborne LiDAR point cloud density should be greater than 0.5 points∙m−2 © 2023 Chinese Society of Forestry. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]  
Jakubowski M K, Guo Q H, Kelly M., Tradeoffs between LiDAR pulse density and forest measurement accuracy, Remote Sensing of Environment, 130, pp. 245-253, (2013)
[22]  
Johnson K D, Birdsey R, Finley A O, Et al., Integrating forest inventory and analysis data into a LiDAR-based carbon monitoring system, Carbon Balance and Management, 9, 1, pp. 1-11, (2014)
[23]  
Kellner J R, Armston J, Birrer M, Et al., New opportunities for forest remote sensing through ultra-high-density drone LiDAR, Surveys in Geophysics, 40, 4, pp. 959-977, (2019)
[24]  
Kim Y, Yang Z Q, Cohen W B, Et al., Distinguishing between live and dead standing tree biomass on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, USA using small-footprint LiDAR data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 11, pp. 2499-2510, (2009)
[25]  
Latifi H, Fassnacht F E, Tharani Muller J, Et al., Forest inventories by LiDAR data: a comparison of single tree segmentation and metric-based methods for inventories of a heterogeneous temperate forest, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 42, pp. 162-174, (2015)
[26]  
Li A H, Dhakal S, Glenn N, Et al., LiDAR aboveground vegetation biomass estimates in shrublands: prediction, uncertainties and application to coarser scales, Remote Sensing, 9, 9, (2017)
[27]  
Lovell J L, Jupp D L B, Newnham G J, Et al., Simulation study for finding optimal LiDAR acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval, Forest Ecology and Management, 214, 1/2/3, pp. 398-412, (2005)
[28]  
Magnussen S, Naesset E, Gobakken T., Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: a case study with Norway spruce, Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 4, pp. 700-712, (2010)
[29]  
Maltamo M, Bollandsas O M, Gobakken T, Et al., Large-scale prediction of aboveground biomass in heterogeneous mountain forests by means of airborne laser scanning, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 46, 9, pp. 1138-1144, (2016)
[30]  
Mascaro J, Detto M, Asner G P, Et al., Evaluating uncertainty in mapping forest carbon with airborne LiDAR, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 12, pp. 3770-3774, (2011)