Multimodal teaching, learning and training in virtual reality: a review and case study

被引:0
作者
Philippe S. [1 ]
Souchet A.D. [1 ,2 ]
Lameras P. [3 ]
Petridis P. [4 ]
Caporal J. [1 ]
Coldeboeuf G. [5 ]
Duzan H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Research, Manzalab, Paris
[2] Paragraph Laboratory, Paris 8 University, Saint-Denis
[3] School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, Coventry University
[4] Aston Business School, Aston University
关键词
Multimodality; Semiotic resources; Teaching and learning; Training; Virtual reality;
D O I
10.1016/j.vrih.2020.07.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is becoming increasingly prevalent in digital learning research to encompass an array of different meanings, spaces, processes, and teaching strategies for discerning a global perspective on constructing the student learning experience. Multimodality is an emergent phenomenon that may influence how digital learning is designed, especially when employed in highly interactive and immersive learning environments such as Virtual Reality (VR). VR environments may aid students' efforts to be active learners through consciously attending to, and reflecting on, critique leveraging reflexivity and novel meaning-making most likely to lead to a conceptual change. This paper employs eleven industrial case-studies to highlight the application of multimodal VR-based teaching and training as a pedagogically rich strategy that may be designed, mapped and visualized through distinct VR-design elements and features. The outcomes of the use cases contribute to discern in-VR multimodal teaching as an emerging discourse that couples system design-based paradigms with embodied, situated and reflective praxis in spatial, emotional and temporal VR learning environments. © 2019 Beijing Zhongke Journal Publishing Co. Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 442
页数:21
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Reigeluth C.M., Beatty B.J., Myers R.D., Instructional-design theories and models. The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education, (2016)
[2]  
Deci E.L., Ryan R.M., Intrinsic motivation, The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, (2010)
[3]  
Carbonneau N., Vallerand R.J., Lafreniere M.A.K., Toward a tripartite model of intrinsic motivation, Journal of Personality, 80, 5, pp. 1147-1178, (2012)
[4]  
Veenman M.V.J., Hout-Wolters B.H.A.M., Afflerbach P., Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations, Metacognition and Learning, 1, 1, pp. 3-14, (2006)
[5]  
Donker A., de Boer H., Kostons D., van Ewijk C.C.D., van der Werf M.P.C., Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: a meta-analysis, Educational Research Review, 11, pp. 1-26, (2014)
[6]  
Prince M.J., Does active learning work? A review of the research, Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 3, pp. 223-231, (2004)
[7]  
Vernon D.T., Blake R.L., Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research, Academic Medicine, 68, 7, pp. 550-563, (1993)
[8]  
Dochy F., Segers M., van den Bossche P., Gijbels D., Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis, Learning and Instruction, 13, 5, pp. 533-568, (2003)
[9]  
Walker A., Leary H., A problem based learning meta analysis: differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3, 1, pp. 6-28, (2009)
[10]  
Hess T., Gunter G.A., Serious game-based and nongame-based online courses: learning experiences and outcomes, British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 3, pp. 372-385, (2013)