Mitigation of drought stress in maize and sorghum by humic acid: differential growth and physiological responses

被引:4
|
作者
Abu-Ria, Mohamed E. [1 ]
Elghareeb, Eman M. [1 ]
Shukry, Wafaa M. [1 ]
Abo-Hamed, Samy A. [1 ]
Ibraheem, Farag [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Bot Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[2] Umm Al Qura Univ, Al Qunfodah Univ Coll, Biol & Chem Dept, Al Qunfodah 21912, Saudi Arabia
来源
BMC PLANT BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Abiotic stress; Physiology; Photosynthesis; Oxidative markers; Osmolytes; Antioxidants; SALINITY STRESS; SALICYLIC-ACID; ANTIOXIDANT; L; CHLOROPHYLL; TOLERANCE; SUBSTANCES; EFFICIENCY; TRAITS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12870-024-05184-4
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background Drought is a major determinant for growth and productivity of all crops, including cereals, and the drought-induced detrimental effects are anticipated to jeopardize world food security under the ongoing global warming scenario. Biostimulants such as humic acid (HA) can improve drought tolerance in many cereals, including maize and sorghum. These two plant species are genetically related; however, maize is more susceptible to drought than sorghum. The physiological and biochemical mechanisms underlying such differential responses to water shortage in the absence and presence of HA, particularly under field conditions, are not fully understood.Results Herein, the effects of priming maize and sorghum seeds in 100 mg L-1 HA on their vegetative growth and physiological responses under increased levels of drought (100%, 80%, and 60% field capacity) were simultaneously monitored in the field. In the absence of HA, drought caused 37.0 and 58.7% reductions in biomass accumulation in maize compared to 21.2 and 32.3% in sorghum under low and high drought levels, respectively. These responses were associated with differential retardation in overall growth, relative water content (RWC), photosynthetic pigments and CO2 assimilation in both plants. In contrast, drought increased root traits as well as H2O2, malondialdehyde, and electrolyte leakage in both species. HA treatment significantly improved the growth of both plant species under well-watered and drought conditions, with maize being more responsive than sorghum. HA induced a 29.2% increase in the photosynthetic assimilation rate in maize compared to 15.0% in sorghum under high drought level. The HA-promotive effects were also associated with higher total chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, RWC, sucrose, total soluble sugars, total carbohydrates, proline, and total soluble proteins. HA also reduced the drought-induced oxidative stress via induction of non-enzymic and enzymic antioxidants at significantly different extents in maize and sorghum.Conclusion The current results identify significant quantitative differences in a set of critical physiological biomarkers underlying the differential responses of field-grown maize and sorghum plants against drought. They also reveal the potential of HA priming as a drought-alleviating biostimulant and as an effective approach for sustainable maize and sorghum production and possibly other crops in drought-affected lands.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physiological and biochemical responses of sorghum to drought stress
    Goche, T.
    Chivasa, S.
    Ngara, R.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 109 : 336 - 336
  • [2] Sorghum in dryland: morphological, physiological, and molecular responses of sorghum under drought stress
    Kibrom B. Abreha
    Muluken Enyew
    Anders S. Carlsson
    Ramesh R. Vetukuri
    Tileye Feyissa
    Tiny Motlhaodi
    Dickson Ng’uni
    Mulatu Geleta
    Planta, 2022, 255
  • [3] Sorghum in dryland: morphological, physiological, and molecular responses of sorghum under drought stress
    Abreha, Kibrom B.
    Enyew, Muluken
    Carlsson, Anders S.
    Vetukuri, Ramesh R.
    Feyissa, Tileye
    Motlhaodi, Tiny
    Ng'uni, Dickson
    Geleta, Mulatu
    PLANTA, 2022, 255 (01)
  • [4] Physiological responses of wheat to drought stress and its mitigation approaches
    Zahoor Ahmad
    Ejaz Ahmad Waraich
    Sajjad Akhtar
    Shazia Anjum
    Tanveer Ahmad
    Wajid Mahboob
    Osama Bin Abdul Hafeez
    Terence Tapera
    Maryke Labuschagne
    Muhammad Rizwan
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2018, 40
  • [5] Physiological responses of wheat to drought stress and its mitigation approaches
    Ahmad, Zahoor
    Waraich, Ejaz Ahmad
    Akhtar, Sajjad
    Anjum, Shazia
    Ahmad, Tanveer
    Mahboob, Wajid
    Hafeez, Osama Bin Abdul
    Tapera, Terence
    Labuschagne, Maryke
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2018, 40 (04)
  • [6] Transcriptomic and physiological responses of contrasting maize genotypes to drought stress
    Wang, Yifan
    Guo, Haoxue
    Wu, Xi
    Wang, Jiarui
    Li, Hongjie
    Zhang, Renhe
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [7] Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery
    Efeoglu, B.
    Ekmekci, Y.
    Cicek, N.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2009, 75 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [8] Growth and Physiological Responses of Quinoa to Drought and Temperature Stress
    Yang, A.
    Akhtar, S. S.
    Amjad, M.
    Iqbal, S.
    Jacobsen, S. -E.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 202 (06) : 445 - 453
  • [9] The Physiological Responses of Maize Seedlings with Different Amylose Content to Drought Stress
    Wu, Wenhao
    Xu, Renyuan
    Liu, Na
    Zhang, Maoxi
    Sun, Ying
    Dang, Yaru
    Xue, Jiquan
    Zhang, Xudong
    Guo, Dongwei
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2023, 42 (05) : 3291 - 3301
  • [10] The Physiological Responses of Maize Seedlings with Different Amylose Content to Drought Stress
    Wenhao Wu
    Renyuan Xu
    Na Liu
    Maoxi Zhang
    Ying Sun
    Yaru Dang
    Jiquan Xue
    Xudong Zhang
    Dongwei Guo
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, 42 : 3291 - 3301