Assessment of cone beam computed tomography use in pediatric and adolescent patients: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
作者
Nahir, Canan Bayraktar [1 ]
Citir, Mesude [2 ]
Colak, Sefa [3 ]
Keldal, Goksal [3 ]
机构
[1] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Muhittin Fisunoglu Caddesi,Omcalik Sokak,Ali Sevki, TR-60600 Tokat, Turkiye
[2] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Muhittin Fisunoglu Caddesi,Omcalik Sokak,Ali Sevki, TR-60030 Tokat, Turkiye
[3] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Muhittin Fisunoglu Caddesi,Omcalik Sokak,Ali Sevki, TR-60030 Tokat, Turkiye
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Cone beam computed tomography; Oral pathology; Orthognathic surgery; Pediatric dentistry; SUPERNUMERARY TEETH; MAXILLARY; CT; DENTISTRY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-04813-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dentomaxillofacial diagnostics in pediatric dentistry is expanding and concerns have been raised about the radiation risks associated with this imaging modality, especially for children. Dentomaxillofacial paediatric imaging: an investigation towards low-dose radiation induced risks (DIMITRA) is a multidisciplinary project focused on optimizing CBCT exposure for children and adolescents. This study aims to clarify the indications behind CBCT scans in children aligned with DIMITRA's recommendations.MethodsFor each CBCT examination, data were collected on patient age at the time of the CBCT examination, gender, reason for request, referring department, CBCT-requested region, and the field of view (FOV) dimension of imaging. The CBCT indications were categorized under six headings according to an adaptation of the DIMITRA project recommendations: impacted teeth, dentoalveolar trauma, orofacial clefts, dental anomalies, bone pathology, syndromes. Indications not categorized in DIMITRA were recorded below the heading "other".ResultsThe most common indication was the "other" category (34.8%), which included implant, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, orofacial anomalies, foreign object and root canal morphology. The least common indication was "orofacial cleft" (1.9%) and no requests were made for cases related to syndromes. Detection of supernumerary tooth in dental anomalies (68.6%) was the most common CBCT indication, while dentigerous cysts (37.6%) were among the most common CBCT indication in bone pathologies and orofacial anomalies (68.1%) in the other category. The most common size was External Center (15 x 15 cm) (27%) and the least common size was Both Arches/small (8 x 8 cm) (0.4%) when the CBCT FOV was analysed.ConclusionsAlthough the option of a smaller FOV size was available, the larger FOV size that included the both jaws were most frequently used. When justifying CBCT requests, patient-specific radiation dose risks should be considered and specific guidelines should be followed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Efficacy of clinical and radiological methods to identify second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars
    Abuabara, Allan
    Baratto-Filho, Flares
    Anele, Juliana Aguiar
    Leonardi, Denise Piotto
    Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (01) : 205 - 209
  • [2] Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth:: a retrospective study
    Acikgoz, A.
    Acikgoz, G.
    Tunga, U.
    Otan, F.
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (03) : 185 - 190
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, The Reference Manual of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, P273
  • [4] Cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: Overview of recent literature
    Aps J.K.M.
    [J]. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2013, 14 (3) : 131 - 140
  • [5] Byk C., 2018, Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr Dent-Special Top, V4, P173
  • [6] Cone beam CT in dental practice
    Dawood, A.
    Patel, S.
    Brown, J.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2009, 207 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [7] Directorate-General for Energy (European Commission), 2012, Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology: evidence-based guidelines
  • [8] A survey of the first 6 years of experience with cone beam CT scanning in a teaching hospital orthodontic department
    Dobbyn, Lorna Mary
    Morrison, Joanna Faye
    Brocklebank, Laetitia Mary
    Chung, Lucy Lai-King
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 40 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [9] Dula Karl, 2014, Swiss Dent J, V124, P1169
  • [10] Espelid I, 2003, Eur J Paediatr Dent, V4, P40