Predictive ability of hypotension prediction index and machine learning methods in intraoperative hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Mohammadi, Ida [1 ]
Firouzabadi, Shahryar Rajai [1 ]
Hosseinpour, Melika [1 ]
Akhlaghpasand, Mohammadhosein [1 ,2 ]
Hajikarimloo, Bardia [1 ]
Tavanaei, Roozbeh [1 ]
Izadi, Amirreza [2 ]
Zeraatian-Nejad, Sam [1 ,2 ]
Eghbali, Foolad [2 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci IUMS, Cardiovasc Surg Res & Dev Comm, Tehran 14665354, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Rasool E Akram Hosp, Surg Res Ctr, Sch Med,Dept Surg, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Intraoperative hypotension; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Deep learning; Anesthesia; POSTINDUCTION HYPOTENSION; WAVE-FORMS; RISK; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; INJURY; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12967-024-05481-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction Intraoperative Hypotension (IOH) poses a substantial risk during surgical procedures. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in predicting IOH holds promise for enhancing detection capabilities, providing an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta analysis explores the intersection of AI and IOH prediction, addressing the crucial need for effective monitoring in surgical settings. Method A search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted. Screening involved two-phase assessments by independent reviewers, ensuring adherence to predefined PICOS criteria. Included studies focused on AI models predicting IOH in any type of surgery. Due to the high number of studies evaluating the hypotension prediction index (HPI), we conducted two sets of meta-analyses: one involving the HPI studies and one including non-HPI studies. In the HPI studies the following outcomes were analyzed: cumulative duration of IOH per patient, time weighted average of mean arterial pressure < 65 (TWA-MAP < 65), area under the threshold of mean arterial pressure (AUT-MAP), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). In the non-HPI studies, we examined the pooled AUROC of all AI models other than HPI. Results 43 studies were included in this review. Studies showed significant reduction in IOH duration, TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg, and AUT-MAP < 65 mmHg in groups where HPI was used. AUROC for HPI algorithms demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUROC = 0.89, 95CI). Non-HPI models had a pooled AUROC of 0.79 (95CI: 0.74, 0.83). Conclusion HPI demonstrated excellent ability to predict hypotensive episodes and hence reduce the duration of hypotension. Other AI models, particularly those based on deep learning methods, also indicated a great ability to predict IOH, while their capacity to reduce IOH-related indices such as duration remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Tianyi
    Chen, Ruiyuan
    Fan, Ning
    Zang, Lei
    Yuan, Shuo
    Du, Peng
    Wu, Qichao
    Wang, Aobo
    Li, Jian
    Kong, Xiaochuan
    Zhu, Wenyi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Predicting Intradialytic Hypotension in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
    Chaudhry, Taha Zahid
    Yadav, Mansi
    Bokhari, Syed Faqeer Hussain
    Fatimah, Syeda Rubab
    Rehman, Abdur
    Kamran, Muhammad
    Asim, Aiman
    Elhefyan, Mohamed
    Yousif, Osman
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [23] Predictive value of machine learning for the severity of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qian, Rui
    Zhuang, Jiamei
    Xie, Jianjun
    Cheng, Honghui
    Ou, Haiya
    Lu, Xiang
    Ouyang, Zichen
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (08)
  • [24] Impact of clinicians' behavior, an educational intervention with mandated blood pressure and the hypotension prediction index software on intraoperative hypotension: a mixed methods study
    de Keijzer, Ilonka N.
    Vos, Jaap Jan
    Yates, David
    Reynolds, Caroline
    Moore, Sally
    Lawton, Rebecca J.
    Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
    Davies, Simon J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2024, 38 (02) : 325 - 335
  • [25] Machine learning for prediction of viral hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Sharifi, Hamid
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Nasiri, Naser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 179
  • [26] Machine Learning Approaches in High Myopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zuo, Huiyi
    Huang, Baoyu
    He, Jian
    Fang, Liying
    Huang, Minli
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27 : e57644
  • [27] Machine learning algorithms for predicting PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vali, Masoumeh
    Nezhad, Hossein Motahari
    Kovacs, Levente
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [28] Machine learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yilin
    Xie, Fengjiao
    Xiong, Qin
    Lei, Honglin
    Feng, Peimin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [29] Prediction of prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Ruiyao
    Chen, Jiayuan
    Yang, Sen
    Luo, Shuqing
    Xiao, Zhongzhou
    Lu, Lu
    Liang, Bilin
    Liu, Sichen
    Shi, Huwei
    Xu, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 177
  • [30] Machine learning prediction models for diabetic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Lianqin
    Shao, Xian
    Yu, Pei
    ENDOCRINE, 2024, 84 (03) : 890 - 902