A novel approach for optimal trajectory design with multiple operation modes of propulsion system, part 1

被引:35
作者
Taheri, Ehsan [1 ]
Junkins, John L. [2 ]
Kolmanovsky, Ilya [3 ]
Girard, Anouck [3 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Low-thrust trajectory optimization; Composite smooth control; Indirect method; Numerical continuation method; Primer vector; Fuel-optimal; Variable specific impulse; OPTIMIZATION; THRUST; CONTINUATION; MISSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.02.042
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Efficient performance of a number of engineering systems is achieved through different modes of operation - yielding systems described as "hybrid", containing both real-valued and discrete decision variables. Prominent examples of such systems, in space applications, could be spacecraft equipped with 1) a variable-I-sp, variable-thrust engine or 2) multiple engines each capable of switching on/off independently. To alleviate the challenges that arise when an indirect optimization method is used, a new framework - Composite Smooth Control (CSC)-is proposed that seeks smoothness over the entire spectrum of distinct control inputs. A salient aftermath of the application of the CSC framework is that the original multi-point boundary-value problem can be treated as a two-point boundary-value problem with smooth, differentiable control inputs; the latter is notably easier to solve, yet can be made to accurately approximate the former hybrid problem. The utility of the CSC framework is demonstrated through a multi-year, multi-revolution heliocentric fuel-optimal trajectory for a spacecraft equipped with a variable-I-sp, variable-thrust engine.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 165
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, THESIS
[2]   New smoothing techniques for solving bang-bang optimal control problems-numerical results and statistical interpretation [J].
Bertrand, R ;
Epenoy, R .
OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 2002, 23 (04) :171-197
[3]   Optimal low-thrust orbit transfers with eclipsing [J].
Betts, John T. .
OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 2015, 36 (02) :218-240
[4]   Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization [J].
Betts, JT .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1998, 21 (02) :193-207
[5]  
Bulirsch R, 2013, INTRO NUMERICAL ANAL, V12
[6]   Optimization of variable-specific-impulse interplanetary trajectories [J].
Casalino, L ;
Colasurdo, G .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2004, 27 (04) :678-684
[7]  
Chang-Diaz F.R., 2004, 3539 NASA
[8]   Automated Design of Multiphase Space Missions Using Hybrid Optimal Control [J].
Chilan, Christian M. ;
Conway, Bruce A. .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2013, 36 (05) :1410-1424
[9]   A Survey of Methods Available for the Numerical Optimization of Continuous Dynamic Systems [J].
Conway, Bruce A. .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 152 (02) :271-306
[10]  
Davoudi B., ARXIV190201465